What do you think?


The JFK Assassination Evidence Handbook: Issues, Evidence & Answers
The JFK Assassination Evidence Handbook brings to light a wealth of evidence that the Warren Commission swept under the rug when it produced the Warren Report in 1964. Drawn from the Commission's own collection of hearings and exhibits, plus thousands of pages of unindexed documents, this evidence decisively refutes the Warren Commission's theory of Oswald as lone assassin. By applying the Commission's own evidence to the key issues of the case, supplemented by the evidence collected by subsequent government panels, The JFK Assassination Evidence Handbook shows beyond a reasonable doubt that at least three assassins targeted President Kennedy in Dallas, that Lee Oswald was not one of the shooters, that Oswald had associations not only with U. S. intelligence, but also with organized crime, that the Dallas police department provided false police radio transcripts to the Commission, that Officer J. D. Tippit's movements following the assassination raise the suspicion he was hunting for Oswald in order to silence him, and that the police department's handling of the forensic evidence was so sloppy that massive falsification and substitution of evidence against Oswald cannot be ruled out. These and many other new revelations are concisely presented and meticulously documented with numerous references to the source documents. This major addition to the assassination literature is an essential reference work and an indispensable guide for defenders of the conspiracist position. No serious student of the Kennedy assassination can afford to be without The JFK Assassination Evidence Handbook.
- GenresHistory
394 pages, Kindle Edition
Published July 15, 2018
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 6 of 6 reviews
October 31, 2019
Mike Davis has published two books in 2018 on the JFK assassination, this one and 'The JFK Assassination Witness Index', which I find to be a very useful reference to accompany this 'evidence handbook'.
Although I have had this one 'on the go' for almost two weeks, there have been breaks in my reading during that time. In fact, this book is a very readable addition to the genre and would make an ideal introduction to the case for anyone new to this subject. It is very sensibly written and confronts the evidence and conclusions/assumptions presented by the Warren Commission.
Davis has clearly studied the murder mysteries of JFK and D.P.D. Officer Tippit, utilising Warren testimonies as well as statements and depositions given to various law enforcement departments.
Although I have had this one 'on the go' for almost two weeks, there have been breaks in my reading during that time. In fact, this book is a very readable addition to the genre and would make an ideal introduction to the case for anyone new to this subject. It is very sensibly written and confronts the evidence and conclusions/assumptions presented by the Warren Commission.
Davis has clearly studied the murder mysteries of JFK and D.P.D. Officer Tippit, utilising Warren testimonies as well as statements and depositions given to various law enforcement departments.
January 28, 2025
I’ve read multiple books on this subject. Only one by Gerald Posner, Case Closed, supports the findings of the Warren Commission. The presented material by the authors that support multiple shooters is a significant number. The findings and presented material support each other and overlap in most of the details. I have no idea what happened on Nov 22, 1963 the day before my 15th birthday but I have come to the conclusion that there was more than one shooter and Kennedy was hit in the front right of his head. The shot that most likely killed him and it came from the area of the grassy knoll. It plausible that Oswald was even involved. Would love to see this mystery resolved in my lifetime. Very good read.
May 28, 2019
Overlooking evidence
I was disappointed that there was no mention of the bullet hole in the presidents vehicle windshield and another bullet strike in the windshield frame. Photos of these strikes exist. I was puzzled that more information regarding the first reports of the rifle found in the tabs dealt with a Mauser and not the Italian rifle. I recall seeing actual photographs of a clearly identified Mauser rifle soon after it was found. Otherwiss, with some additional minor points, the book is extremely well written and easy to follow.
I was disappointed that there was no mention of the bullet hole in the presidents vehicle windshield and another bullet strike in the windshield frame. Photos of these strikes exist. I was puzzled that more information regarding the first reports of the rifle found in the tabs dealt with a Mauser and not the Italian rifle. I recall seeing actual photographs of a clearly identified Mauser rifle soon after it was found. Otherwiss, with some additional minor points, the book is extremely well written and easy to follow.
November 6, 2019
Great analysis presented so as one can formulate an opinion
Easy read and understanding of the facts. Davis gives non biased material and connects all in conclusions that help to define the true events of what could or could not have happened.
Easy read and understanding of the facts. Davis gives non biased material and connects all in conclusions that help to define the true events of what could or could not have happened.
December 28, 2021
Interesting and well written
Very well written and researched. I appreciated the balanced approach and the examination of multiple viewpoints. This is a worthwhile book to consider about the Kennedy assassination.
Very well written and researched. I appreciated the balanced approach and the examination of multiple viewpoints. This is a worthwhile book to consider about the Kennedy assassination.
June 9, 2023
The flow of this bookis not great. It does make a strong point that the Warren Commission selected the the testimony it choosee to base its conclusion (lone nut killer Oswald). This approach of using only Commission sources was interesting. More time could have been spent on why this occurred.
Displaying 1 - 6 of 6 reviews



