Counterpleasures takes up a series of literary and physical pleasures that do not appear to be pleasurable, ranging from saintly asceticism to Sadean narrative to leathersex. Each is placed in its cultural context to unfold a history of transgressive pleasure and to argue for the value and power of such pleasures as resistant to more totalizing forms of power.
Read this for my thesis, loved it. Especially the last chapter or two, theory as poetry, as what hits u hard. Love and loss and forgoing the self of it all.
The "ok" part is not so much a quibble with MacKendrick as much as it was just not in my interest to read deeply about Sade and Masoch at this particular juncture. I was primarily interested in her working out of the connection (if any) between desire, pleasure, pain and restraint within the context of Christian asceticism. This was a fruitful reading if for nothing else than to put forth the rather uncomfortable discussion that on a philosophical and bodily level Christian asceticism and s/m cross paths in their respective portrayals of power and restraint, subjectivity and negotiation of limits with respect to the body.
hm.... it's amazing knowing n feeling the flow from masochism to ascetism.... betul2 spiritual. masokis sejati... bukan spt yang banyak kita ketahui.., hanya fisik dan berhenti pada tubuh. McKendrick justru sanggup menjelaskan rinci dengan rasional intensitas yang menjadikan segalanya dekat... benci dengan cinta... sakit dengan nikmat... masokis dg asketis.. ck..ck..ck...
This book was too philosophical for me. After the first few chapters, I just didn't care enough. There were some interesting parts to it. After a while, it was too much like work and I have other books I'd rather enjoy.