Well written, if a bit dull throughout. Surprisingly expansive in scope, though gaps in coverage are apparent (see below), as well as are some liberties taken in generalization of issues here and there. On the whole, this is a useful base text for a course in modern church history and theology. The focus aligns primarily with academic interests in American Christianity.
I especially appreciated the inclusion of eye-opening chapters on African Christology, Chinese Eschatology, and the chapter on the arts. Chapters on Reformed Epistemology and Analytic Theology were very clear. The treatment of Princeton theology was good, if a bit lacking in a more national perspective. It’s a shame that Machen continues to be lumped in with Fundamentalists rather than a distinctive evangelical confessionalism.
I was disappointed that there was no mention of certain theologians’ (namely, Barth and Tillich) gross moral failures as a factor in giving consideration to their respective theologies/careers. The chapter on postconservative theology was a bit annoying, but that was probably because of the subject matter more than it was due to the author’s presentation. Also, why cover BioLogos without at least mentioning Answers in Genesis (the larger, more well-funded, and more influential organization) and the YEC movement? Why discuss Charles Spurgeon at length without at least mentioning personalities as significant as Cornelius Van Til, Geerhardus Vos, Abraham Kuyper, or Herman Bavinck? The discussion of biblical theology (think von Rad, Vos, etc.) was subsumed under the heading of narrative theology. There was no dedicated explanation of the documentary hypothesis.