Assigned class reading. A bit of an academic read, but not so much that it is bogged down.
There were three basic definitions: Queer as slur, the Queer movement in response to the slur that seeks to deconstruct labeling around gender and sexuality and promote equity, and Queer as a verb - as in being set outside the norm (so, in part slur in verb form, but a bit broader). The last one is where it felt muddy. I felt some non-heteronormative things were rolled into Queerness as an example of being set outside the social norm, but it seemed to dilute the purpose of the Queer movement and the reasons for specifically deconstructing gendered labels or those attached to sexuality. But I may be wrong in that and I was glad for a better understanding of queer in general.
There was a lot of good information that invites a rethinking of the binary model of gender identity and gender roles. Great information about gender and sexuality and the spectrum of identity and presentation. I.E. same-sex behavior does not necessarily equate to homosexual identity, and so forth.
Overall this sparked in me the feeling that it would be an amazing world to grow up in, where you could ask yourself: who do I like? who do I feel like? how do I feel about that? as questions un-weighted by social expectations, whether those are secular or religious. Imagine moving into adolescence without struggling with questions of being 'too' feminine or masculine, or not enough, or worrying about attraction indicating an unwanted identity (or worrying about a lack of attraction). My generation didn't have that and the idea of future generations having that freedom to figure it out without fear of hellfire or discrimination is a wonderful ideal to aim for.