Jump to ratings and reviews
Rate this book

Comment la parole vient aux enfants: de la naissance jusqu'à deux ans

Rate this book
Comment le nouveau-né perçoit-il les sons qui constituent la parole? Comment peut-il les reconnaître, les organiser et les analyser? Comment en vient-il à les comprendre et à les reproduire? Comment, donc, la parole vient-elle aux enfants?

289 pages, Paperback

First published January 1, 1996

3 people are currently reading
36 people want to read

About the author

Benedicte de Boysson-Bardies is a Director of Research in the Experimental Psychology Laboratory at the Centre Nationale de la Recherche Scientifique in Paris.

~

Psycholinguiste, spécialiste de l'acquisition du langage chez les jeunes enfants. - Directrice de recherche au laboratoire de psychologie expérimentale du CNRS (en 1999)

Ratings & Reviews

What do you think?
Rate this book

Friends & Following

Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!

Community Reviews

5 stars
7 (43%)
4 stars
7 (43%)
3 stars
1 (6%)
2 stars
1 (6%)
1 star
0 (0%)
Displaying 1 - 3 of 3 reviews
Profile Image for Cassidy Brinn.
239 reviews28 followers
Read
January 3, 2010
An inviting read, the relatively casual presentation helped me quickly digest the whole. I could hardly put it down. It works well as a partial introduction to the field of experimental linguistics, without proceeding too slowly.

Occasionally, though, the facts are obscured by the chatty tone. For example - non-nutritive sucking is a fascinating method and I admire the ingenuity of Siqueland and DeLucia for thinking it up. It unmistakably demonstrates powers of discrimination among infants. However, in discussing various cases, Boysson-Bardies allows herself to draw conclusions regarding preference as well. When she introduces the method, she explains that "monotony is the mother to boredom": the infants suck more when they recognize a change, such as from rat to cat, because new things excite them. However, babies also prefer to listen to their own name more than to others' - does this not contradict the monotony hypothesis?

One entertainment highlight is the bias against American research and American mothers, whom Boysson-Bardies portrays as simple-minded in their excessive competitiveness. She makes a good case. It is irrelevant how many nouns a kid can produce, whereas speaking freely to children cultivates the charms of conversation, and I imagine protects the parents' sanity. (You can only repeat the word DOG so many times, God help me).

The cross-cultural comparisons altogether were the most fascinating part of the book, though some of the studies struck me as too small to be reliable.
Displaying 1 - 3 of 3 reviews

Can't find what you're looking for?

Get help and learn more about the design.