I'm rather torn about this book. I'd give it five stars for introducing many new angles from which to consider the evidence of evolution vs creation, and for raising much, and very persuasive evidence, in favor of creation. Also, I like that he recognises that creationism doens't mean evolution doesn't or didn't take place, but that he distinguishes between micro-evolution -- evolution of different bird species within birds, or finches with different beaks within finches, etc; and macro-evolution -- the evolution of man from ape, or mammals and birds from reptiles/amphibians, etc. And he quotes many Christian and non-Christian scientists, so a lot of stimulating material here.
But: I'd give him a 2-3 stars for breaking every so often into rather unscientific atheist bashing. Its annoying and makes it rather hard to get through to the good parts. (I made up for this by reading a few pages a week over the last few months, with frequent breaks when I couldn't take it any more.) It also unfortunately means that this book has a near zero probability of being read and thereby influencing a materialist/atheist of any stripe, simply because its tone and lingo is, I think, a bit too extreme.
Worth a careful re-read, I think, with some note-taking and summarising to strip out the argument from the rhetoric.