Over the course of an extraordinary year, Zev Chafets—former New York Daily News columnist and onetime director of the Israeli government press office—traveled the world to explore the improbable confluence of Jews and evangelicals. He spent quality time with Jerry Falwell, visited Jewish cadets at West Point, attended the world's biggest Christian retail show, embarked on a road trip with the rabbi with the largest gentile following since Jesus, journeyed to the Holy Land with a band of repentant Christian pilgrims, and broke bread with George W. Bush and five hundred fellow Jewish Republicans.
A Match Made in Heaven is the penetrating, engaging, and often hilarious narrative of Chafets's determined quest to get to the root of a very serious question: Why do evangelicals support Israel so strongly? Equal parts history, comedy, travelogue, and political tract, it is a smart and adventurous odyssey along a rapidly changing religious and political border.
Oddly smug, and more than a little sad. About evangelicals' support for Israel, which needs to rebuild the Second Temple so Jesus can come back and defeat Satan. It's a typically pugnacious Israeli book (I keep getting the sense of him sitting back and feeling self-satisfied with how many stereotypes he's punctured), but also a desperate one: when the best you can do for allies is a group whose members keep "accidentally" spitting out messages about how Jews really need to accept Jesus and don't do so only out of stubbornness, that's a pretty sad sign.
This was an interesting book about the alliances between evangelical Christians and Jews regarding Israel. My problem with it is that I felt the author believes we should be unquestioning in our support of Israel, and I can't, and won't be unquestioning in my support of anyone.
A fascinating read! I believe the purpose of the book is to encourage American Jews to accept the friendship and political partnership of evangelical Christians as they mutually support Israel. I was surprised to hear of the historical alienation of evangelicals and Jews in America, I suppose because I have so frequently heard of “Judeo-Christian values.” I think the author is fair to both groups and crafted a creative and interesting argument.
It's hard to give an opinion on this entertaining little book. Why? Well, the subject is one everyone gets touchy on, and practically anything the author says is going to be misinterpreted or ignored. Almost anything one says to build bridges will not prosper. This author tries it, though. And if I give his book 4 stars it's because, whatever the results may be, and even if I myself don't agree with some things, I have to admit that the book is fun.
Bottom-line is: Jews and Christian Evangelicals should get along. Issues separating us are trivial in comparison to the gains we can make if we stay together in the grand issues that both concern us. Just quit fuming about the Inquisition. That was in Europe, not America, by the way. Quit blaming Christian America for every evil: the Holocaust took place in Europe too. Christian America is Your friend, not Your enemy. Give us a break.
A multitude of Christians are stretching out their hands to Israel. So why not take it? It seems so simple.
Well obviously it ain't that simple when a lot of high class East Coast American Jewry still feel very prejudiced towards the average American of middle class. That they are disconnected with real America -not the America of their cocktail parties- doesn't seem to register with them. And if I say that they shouldn't be afraid of a Christian America because it's always been Christian from its inception and they got along pretty well, I won't be contributing much to mellowing the situation. But that's true. Judeo-Christian values made America possible. Maybe it ain't anymore so, but it sure was in the past. So what else do these Christian-hating Jews want? Christians are willing to stay with Israel and honest Jews through whatever it takes, but are not willing to deny their own Christ -the best Jew that ever was.
I guess well-intentioned books like this one are doomed to fail mainly because there's too much resentment, pride, hate, etc that corrupts any efforts done.
What I didn't like much was the common denominator used to explain the reasoning why this alliance should go on. Convenience and utilitarianism do not appeal to people who are spiritually minded and really believe in God. But I let it fly. On the other hand the book is a wealth of information: The who is who of the Evangelical and Jewish worlds.
Divide and conquer has always been the devil's favorite sport.
The author’s politics are terrible but his reporting on the new Evangelical love for “the Jews” and the State of Israel is an ironic introduction to the major trends and players. He makes some sharp observations on the class/status issues around Jewish aversions to their new BFFs: “Jews may not have landed at Plymouth Rock, but in recent decades they have made it to Martha’s Vineyard, and they are sometimes not very sensitive to the feelings of the inhabitants of Gilligan’s Island.” The alliance is like “having friends with terrible taste in music.” And Armageddon? Liberals too have their “endtime utopia”: “a day when evangelical Bible-thumpers scrape the Confederate decals off their trucks and the mayonnaise off their sandwiches, beat their hunting rifles into sixteen-speed bicycles….” Clever. Chafets’ politics are unprincipled self-interest and he is uncharitable to Israel’s critics—academics, mainline Prots, pro-Pals—so he loves the Christian Zionist “match,” most liberals will not.
insightful and witty. the author's style is of the type i aspire to:
"But liberals in academia, the entertainment business, and the media need to be a little less self-righteous about this. They, too, promote an end-times utopia, a day when evangelical Bible-thumpers scrape the Confederate decals off their trucks and the mayonnaise off their sandwiches, beat their hunting rifles into sixteen-speed bicycles, replace Genesis with Darwin, and embrace Seinfeld values" (p. 195).
I rated this book highly because of its "informational" value. The content of Zev's reporting is not generally known by the evangelical crowd that I associate with and should be. The question that lingers is whether new and younger evangelical leaders will follow in the footsteps of Falwell and Robertson in terms of their relationship to Israel? But we need another book by Zev to answer that question.
Hmmm, one of the few non-religious ppl that is politically conservative that I found both credible and interesting. I was surprised :-) He seemed to be pretty objective about both religious jews and religious right wing evangelicals...all from the outside..a pretty easy and quick read, as well. I enjoyed this book