Jump to ratings and reviews
Rate this book

Lectures on Rhetoric and Belles Lettres

Rate this book
This is a reproduction of the original artefact. Generally these books are created from careful scans of the original. This allows us to preserve the book accurately and present it in the way the author intended. Since the original versions are generally quite old, there may occasionally be certain imperfections within these reproductions. We're happy to make these classics available again for future generations to enjoy!

514 pages, Paperback

First published January 1, 1783

3 people are currently reading
135 people want to read

About the author

Hugh Blair

675 books5 followers
Hugh Blair FRSE was a Scottish minister of religion, author and rhetorician, considered one of the first great theorists of written discourse. He was a significant figure in the Scottish Enlightenment and is best known for his Lectures on Rhetoric and Belles Lettres (1783), a prescriptive guide to composition.

In 1783 Blair was one of the founder members of the Royal Society of Edinburgh. He served as its Literary President from 1789 to 1796.

Ratings & Reviews

What do you think?
Rate this book

Friends & Following

Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!

Community Reviews

5 stars
14 (51%)
4 stars
5 (18%)
3 stars
7 (25%)
2 stars
1 (3%)
1 star
0 (0%)
Displaying 1 - 5 of 5 reviews
Profile Image for Brian Fitzroy.
Author 3 books
January 13, 2014
This is absolutely amazing! I loved it. The guy can write, better than any person I've ever read. He can critique pretty well too. He gives insights that only a genius can give. This is just like the title says, Lectures on Rhetoric and Belles Lectures. He writes in a way completely opposite of the typical modern professor who can't write a single sentence without pretentious jargon. He even critiques those types of writers. If you want to edit, profess, speak, write, or just compose something, here is your guide. Make sure, however, that you know grammar pretty well, otherwise things might go over your head. I didn't have to read it for a class, but I did read it for fun; and I had a lot of fun with it, because, well, there is a lot to read. If you have to read it, just like anything you are assigned, good luck enjoying it. I knew going into it I didn't need luck, I had a strong desire to learn from this master rhetor. I gave away my copy of it to a friend, but I'll get another copy and write a more detailed review. Until then, the only thing left to say is that make sure you have a bookstand...or really strong wrists ;)
Profile Image for Michael Greer.
278 reviews47 followers
December 17, 2020
We must always remember that there are few facts more important to a successful life than establishing Blair's place in Eighteenth-Century British rhetorical theory. I can't stress this enough because the psychological-epistemological accounts of those years were at the very foundation of Blair's sense of style and eloquence. The shift away from the influence of the orator was made possible by the printing press. When 'our' minds were altered by that technology, scanning and grapheme awareness overrode the importance of active listening. The old model was 'let's listen to the speaker' while, in the modern era, 'let's read the printed word.'

How do you hold an audience using only the printed word? This is the fundamental problem. Because humans are more than those who scan a screen or printed text; they also verbalize, they also need to hear a voice. What had been the excellence of the rhetor, the one who speaks to others, is now the author, the one who writes for others. This is why we are thoroughly confused as a group of people: do we want literacy or do we want rhetoric? We need both.
Profile Image for Mary.
994 reviews55 followers
June 7, 2011
Brainy fellow that Hugh Blair. Highlights: local, current, national writing; passion and emotion; naive as a good thing; thinking it out first; plenty of admiration of Addison.
Profile Image for Rachel.
690 reviews60 followers
October 3, 2012
Hard to say whether or not I "liked" this. I wouldn't have read it if not for research. But I find his ideas interesting and easy to read.
Displaying 1 - 5 of 5 reviews

Can't find what you're looking for?

Get help and learn more about the design.