This book contains two full-length books and I read The Stoneware Monkey only. I am saving The Penrose Mystery for later.
The writing style is a little stilted, old-fashioned, especially for a book published in 1939. But that did not hinder the enjoyment of this, although I was perhaps a bit ahead of the plot in considering all the possibilities of who the murder victim was. But the narrative is presented by two different characters, so this perhaps justifies why more is not revealed sooner. And neither of these characters is the sleuth--they are more the Watson type who records what is seen but doesn't always get to the right conclusion.
I look forward to the second book inside these covers when I will see what else R. Austin Freeman can do.
I finished The Penrose Mystery on April 8, 2023. It was, in fact, much like the Stoneware Monkey in that there is excessive attention to detail and to collecting the proof that is actual evidence of murder. It is a convoluted story and goes on a tad too long. Just when you think it is solved, nope, the evidence is not conclusive. And as before, the story has more than one narrator, so the reader is conscious that what they present is filtered by the narrator's point of view which is never as all-seeing or critical as Dr. John Thorndyke's. I think I would give this mystery 3 stars, not 4, just because I got a little tired of it near the end. Cleverness isn't everything. Let's move the plot along a little faster.