To begin: anyone who thinks that upon coming across this review will be reading a pleasant intake of this highly irritating book -will be utterly mistaken. So if you liked this review - it is simply for the reason that you understand its honesty.
Yes - I am a catholic. Yes - I did not like Archbishop Fulton Sheen and this book of his concerning Our Lady.
Why?
Let us take a look at page 139 entitled "Mary and the Moslems".
First thought - really? A whole ENTIRE book (considering this is an abridged version) about the MOTHER OF GOD and here it is that SOMEHOW islam is enforced into it? A whole entire CHAPTER dedicated to Islam and Mary? But i thought according to Islam Mary is one of the Persons of the Trinity..... whats this got to do with Mary and the doctrine of her being the Mother of God?
Now - already one is sketchy because in light of the Modern Church of today, everything is about INCORPORATING; islam, homosexuals, other religions (inter-religious dialogue), the overuse of charity for absolutely everything (as though charity is an excuse for anyone to do anything), and the entire and complete denial of the Justice of God {because God is forgiving, people, remember you do not need to repent, everything is going to be fine because you are all forgiven (sarcastic attitude detected!!!)} is ALL HEAPED UP INTO ONE.
And here we are; Fulton Sheen has the SAME, EXACT light tone, fluffy attitude, here concerning Mary, like every other modernist one will face in the church today.
And let's give SOME examples of why this chapter is particularly irritating.
In the third paragraph, Fulton writes; "If Islam is a heresy, as Hilarie Belloc believes it to be, it is the only heresy that has never declined".
WHOA>>>>>> Brain Explosion.
Are you serious? NEVER declined? Not ONCE declined?
Uhm... Lets take a look BACK into history. There were MANY MANY times when Islam declined. Lets not look too back and say how about the 18th century? Europe became a rising power, colonising the entire west in the advancement of technologies. And THEN is islam seen to wax up and down within the 18th-19th century and decline again within the early 20th century (the two world wars).
This sentence ALONE poses enough problems for me to write A WHOLE DARN ESSAY ABOUT.
And whats with this twisting when Fulton says; "as Hilarie Belloc believes it to be"?
What; do you think that ONLY Belloc believes islam to be a heresy?
Do you, Fulton, believe that because Islam has not EVER declined that therefore islam is not a heresy at all?
I do not understand what you are implying? What are you feeding Catholic Folk who are ALREADY weak in the faith? ???????
After this sentence, Fulton continues to examine how heresies have floated away and etc, but islam has not. This begs the question then ... if islam has not floated away like other heresies, then is Fulton saying that there is something special about islam? Is islam, here again is what im sensing Fulton is implying, not heretical?
Wait, it gets better. "There was never a time in which it (islam) declined, either in numbers or in devotion to of its followers".
WHOOOOAAAAA! What an assertion. So am i to believe that Islam has never declined in its numbers? What? Is Fulton an expert in population reports over THOUSANDS OF YEARS? There is evidence to the contrary as aforementioned about the decline of Islam. It only follows from this evidence that that the devotion of the followers would too also decline.... Fulton baffles me.
Does not Fulton KNOW that islam's growth AND decline is primarily BASED on the 6 empires/caliphates that arose out of islamic militant leaders and brought islam up and then back down upon its face?
Islam was not an accepted identity previously from the 19th, or lets say really and truly, 20th century. It was constantly in war with the western culture. It tried to take over Europe. It has NOW, right NOW, currently, successfully overtaken Europe. The first time out of the 6 various islamic caliphates.
--------
It looks like that Fulton fits in with the vatican two crowd of incorporating inter-religious dialogue within the church, like the acclaimed church document called "nostra atate" - literally in latin "in this age". Perfectly droll, isnt it? 👌
-------
I will not proceed any longer upon this review. It has wasted enough of my time. 😤😤😤🤦♀️
Quite frankly, the entire book, really this abridged version, annoyed me. Light, fluffy, modern (by way of using modern contraptions and conceptions), and utterly depriving me of any spiritual enlightment and enjoyment has been a waste of time. Even for 5 minutes.
This is one that will stay upon my shelf, so that when the time comes I will have a tool (this darn book) which will become a topic of discussion in educating students in what NOT to read and what NOT to write about when discussing doctrinal matters. Or even spiritual, scriptural matters.
So: this is not a pleasant review as i warned you - and it is for the precise reason due to the honesty of review about this book. I hope you donot read this. 👍🧐😐