What do you think?
Rate this book
Unknown Virginia Woolf
A fourth edition of a title first published in 1978, which provides a study of the life and work of Virginia Woolf, offering reasons for her breakdown and demonstrating the ways in which she challenged the conventions of communication, with a new preface evaluating recent developments in the study of her work included in this edition.
- GenresBiography
360 pages, Paperback
First published September 29, 1978
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 3 of 3 reviews
January 15, 2018
Very interesting take on Virginia's life, slighty opposing the biography of Mr. Bell and biographies by Leonard Woolf. Central theme revolves around the before mentioned men calling Virginia 'mad' or 'insane'. The Author provides reasons, supported by multitude of literature, of falsity of those claims, offering an overview of her condition through the years of her life.
January 4, 2010
My fascination with the life and circumstances of Virginia Woolf continues to haunt my subconscious thirst for knowledge. It is that fascination that led me once again to the 820-ish section of my local library, where I stumbled upon The Unknown Virginia Woolf by Roger Poole.
Like many Woolf biographers, Mr. Poole seeks to answer the fabled "was Virginia Woolf insane" question. However, he begins with a preconceived conception that insanity did not exist in the mind of Virginia Woolf, and sets out to prove this point by referencing Woolf's texts. I understand that this book was meant to be a biography and not a scientific research paper... but something rubbed me the wrong way about the author's determination to prove Virginia Woolf's sanity by referencing her work, as opposed to the other way around. Instead of beginning with the theory and hand-picking evidence to support it, shouldn't Mr. Poole rather emerge himself in the works of Woolf and draw conclusions from the evidence?
So while I enjoyed the concept of him applying the correlating periods of Virginia Woolf's life to her writings (example, the unconsummated engagement of The Voyage Out which parallels Virginia Woolf's inability to embrace her role as both wife and lover), the twisting and omission of multiple facts rendered the book a failure in my opinion.
Complete review available at:
http://whatrefuge.blogspot.com/2010/0...
Like many Woolf biographers, Mr. Poole seeks to answer the fabled "was Virginia Woolf insane" question. However, he begins with a preconceived conception that insanity did not exist in the mind of Virginia Woolf, and sets out to prove this point by referencing Woolf's texts. I understand that this book was meant to be a biography and not a scientific research paper... but something rubbed me the wrong way about the author's determination to prove Virginia Woolf's sanity by referencing her work, as opposed to the other way around. Instead of beginning with the theory and hand-picking evidence to support it, shouldn't Mr. Poole rather emerge himself in the works of Woolf and draw conclusions from the evidence?
So while I enjoyed the concept of him applying the correlating periods of Virginia Woolf's life to her writings (example, the unconsummated engagement of The Voyage Out which parallels Virginia Woolf's inability to embrace her role as both wife and lover), the twisting and omission of multiple facts rendered the book a failure in my opinion.
Complete review available at:
http://whatrefuge.blogspot.com/2010/0...
June 1, 2022
3.5 stars
Displaying 1 - 3 of 3 reviews