What do you think?
Rate this book


333 pages, Hardcover
First published February 1, 1905
This book was written by Mr. Vedder as part of a series on leaders of the Reformation. In his book, A Short History of the Baptists, I first heard of Hubmaier, and he strongly drew my attention: due to his background and the nature of his conversion, the conversion of nearly his whole parish to Anabaptism, his powerful defense of Biblical truth, his imprisonment and torture by fellow-reformers, his incredibly successful labors at Nikolsburg (from my perspective, and I trust God’s), his final martyrdom, and the bravery and faithfulness of his wife. In reading this book, my appreciation of him has grown all the more. He certainly had some major failures, but there is so much to admire and imitate.
To my sorrow, I found in some added research, in the course of my reading of A Short History of the Baptists, that by the time this book was written Vedder was on his way to what would become complete and open apostasy. Professor of Church History at Crozer Theological Seminary from 1894 to 1926, his “sad theological drift,” as W. B. Riley put it, is evident as one reads his books. At first, his personal acceptance and full sympathy with the historic beliefs of the Baptists is clear and inspiring. Gradually, such as in this biography of Hubmaier, published in 1906, one begins to note a more detached approach, with sentences like “To him the gospel was the one remedy for all the ills of man” (emphasis added). Finally, in The Fundamentals of Christianity, published in 1922, he sets out to destroy everything Baptists, nay, Christians, believe, attacking the inspiration and authority of Scripture, railing against the doctrine of the substitutionary atonement of Christ, accurately presenting the Gospel then plainly denying it—it is doubtful if he still believed a single one of the fundamental doctrines of Christianity!
Nonetheless, I found this to be an excellent (besides being the only) biography of Hubmaier. Vedder’s manner of writing is very interesting; he truly does strive for fairness and accuracy in his portrayal of the facts of Hubmaier’s life; he is sympathetic to the man, though there is no way he could have entirely understood him (I Cor. 2:15); and he extensively quotes Hubmaier’s own writings. For me personally, the Lord used this book to greatly challenge and encourage.