320About The bookThe Maratha period of the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, when an independent Maratha state successfully resisted the Mughals, is a defining era in Indian history. Prachi Deshpande examines the invocation of this period in various political projects, including anticolonial Hindu nationalism and the non-Brahman movement, as well as popular debates throughout the nineteenth and twentieth centuries over the meanings of tradition, culture, colonialism, and modernity. Deploying a rich body of literary and cultural sources, Deshpande highlights shifts in history writing in early modern western India, as well as the deep connection between historical and literary narratives. She also shows how historical memory provided a space for Indians to negotiate among their national, religious, and regional identities, pointing out historys pervasive potential for shaping politics within thoroughly divers societies. A study of
A very unique (meta-) book, presenting a sort of history of Maratha historiography. It wonderfully weaves together the various narratives and socio-political context under which historiography develops and evolves. This is particularly true for the sub-continent during the pre- and post-colonial periods.
The book very nicely articulates these different narratives, some of which could be contradictory to each other. Maratha history evolved across a wide-variety of competing contexts, pre-Modern vs. Modern historiography, History from Social/Collective Memory vs. History from Documentation, English elites vs. Maharashtrian elites, Brahman vs. non-Brahman elites, Hindus vs. Muslims, Maharashtra vs. India, Upper castes vs. Lower castes, Reformists vs. Nationalists, etc. All these, in many cases even orthogonal, aspects are beautifully brought out in the book. The book is heavy on terminology commonly used in historiography, and this was challenging at times for a non-specialist reader like me.
Influenced by V Narayana Rao, Shulman, and Subrahmanyam's Textures of Time, this book traces a complex history of Maratha historiography. To write this the author has mastered a myriad of species of sources. She talks of bards, court poets and historians, politicians, academics, and administrators. The most beautiful fact about the book is how startlingly complicated everything. We don't have intelligible baskets of 'scientific' and 'sentimental' or 'Brahminical' and 'Anti-Brahmin', 'secular' and 'communal' or 'mythic'. There is beauty in every stance and every kind of history she speaks about. Thanks to this book, we are brought up to date with the political dynamics of Maharashtra.