I took my time reading this book. As with most books "similiar" to this one (in subject and delivery), I think it is difficult to discuss it in terms of good/bad. What do readers expect/want out of this book? Like, when they approach it and open the first pages, what is lingering in the back of their minds? I open this review oddly with this question because there is this review on Amazon for this book. Its very short: "Not a bad attempt. But not particularly useful." - they gave it three of five stars. And that review is so fascinating to me because it is so self-reflective, as well!
I have read so much religion, philosophy, theology, etc. that I am rather desensitized to having expectations. More often, I am reading with a FAR FAR too critical eye. Finding the arguments - deciding if these are valid, invalid, justified... wondering if the arguments could be groundwork for larger arguments, etc. Its instinctually academic with me.
All of that being said, this book is one of the few where I sincerely say I wish I knew the "author." Fukushima was definitely someone I would want to hang out with, study with, converse with, etc. So, I did find a lot of insights or interesting perspectives in this work. I did. It is not the same as the bulk of "Buddhism" stuffing the public consumption shelves. But more than the insights, I felt like I really would like to have known this Zen master.
The worrying part is that maybe that is the influence of the translator/editor of the work, Schireson. Every time someone touches a text... etc. etc. etc.
In any case, I don't know how "useful" the book is. It seems ridiculous to ask. But, then, maybe, that is the precise question to ask! I dunno! What is zen!