What do you think?
Rate this book


352 pages, Hardcover
First published January 1, 2016
Fortunately I found a review by Richard Tempest from the Department of Slavic Languages and Literatures at the University of Illinois, which was much more enlightening. Armed with this background information from Professor Tempest's review at the LA Review of Books) and Michael Orthofer's overview of the features of pre- and post revolutionary Russian Literature and its contemporary situation in
The Complete Review's Guide to Contemporary World Fiction,
I went back to the novel...
There is a throughline. It's the story of Grisha, whose tales traverse time and space but are always situated in the north, in Karelia near Russia's border with Finland. It is this representation of regional Russia that makes Novikov's writing distinctive. Because, as Tempest tells us, Russia’s novelists tended to depict their country as a geographical and demographic sameness. He quotes Erich Auerbach, who fled Nazi Germany to Istanbul where he wrote his magnum opus, a history of western literature from Homer to Woolf, with only limited access to works of literature in translation:'With the exception of the two principal cities, Moscow and Saint Petersburg, whose distinctly different characteristics are clearly recognized from literary sources, it is a rare occurrence if a city, hamlet, or province is identified.' And: 'The landowners, civil servants, merchants, clergymen, petty bourgeois, and peasants seem everywhere to be ‘Russian’ in much the same way.' (Mimesis: The Representation of Reality in Western Literature (1946, 1953 in English) by Erich Auerbach, quoted in Tempest's review.)