Jump to ratings and reviews
Rate this book

Relative Intimacy

Rate this book
Celebrated as new consumers and condemned for their growing delinquencies, teenage girls emerged as one of the most visible segments of American society during and after World War II. Contrary to the generally accepted view that teenagers grew more alienated from adults during this period, Rachel Devlin argues that postwar culture fostered a father-daughter relationship characterized by new forms of psychological intimacy and tinged with eroticism.

According to Devlin, psychiatric professionals turned to the Oedipus complex during World War II to explain girls' delinquencies and antisocial acts. Fathers were encouraged to become actively involved in the clothing and makeup choices of their teenage daughters, thus domesticating and keeping under paternal authority their sexual maturation.

In Broadway plays, girls' and women's magazines, and works of literature, fathers often appeared as governing figures in their daughters' sexual coming of age. It became the common sense of the era that adolescent girls were fundamentally motivated by their Oedipal needs, dependent upon paternal sexual approval, and interested in their fathers' romantic lives. As Devlin demonstrates, the pervasiveness of depictions of father-adolescent daughter eroticism on all levels of culture raises questions about the extent of girls' independence in modern American society and the character of fatherhood during America's fabled embrace of domesticity in the 1940s and 1950s.

272 pages, Paperback

First published May 23, 2005

2 people are currently reading
36 people want to read

About the author

Rachel Devlin

7 books9 followers

Ratings & Reviews

What do you think?
Rate this book

Friends & Following

Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!

Community Reviews

5 stars
1 (5%)
4 stars
5 (29%)
3 stars
5 (29%)
2 stars
6 (35%)
1 star
0 (0%)
Displaying 1 - 2 of 2 reviews
Profile Image for Edward Champion.
1,643 reviews127 followers
March 7, 2021
Some interesting observations about patriarchal roles. But this really didn't need to be a book. Relentlessly repetitive in its scholarship.
Profile Image for L.M. Elm.
233 reviews8 followers
October 5, 2013
Thought the premises was a little too far reaching. Felt like I was reading a dissertation with vague conclusions and muddled premise. Struggled to get through this book. And thankful when it ended.
Displaying 1 - 2 of 2 reviews

Can't find what you're looking for?

Get help and learn more about the design.