The Resurrection of Evil by Neelabh Pratap Singh is a mythological thriller based on The Mahabharata. The story follows ACP Aryan, of crime branch, on his mission to recover an antique artifact, stolen by a famous antiques robber, which throws him into a vicious puzzle, which needs to be solved before it’s too late.
Aryan has been appointed the in-charge of the National Museum robbery, from where the recently excavated pot has been stolen. This brings him to the capital city of Delhi, from where he takes up the reigns, along with a team of Delhi Police. In hot pursuit of the robber, Aryan decides to meet the archaeologist who had excavated the pot, for he wanted some light on why this particular piece has interested the criminal. It leads him to Dr. Vats, a learned man, who unfortunately doesn’t know much about the pot except they happened to find it buried beneath a rectangular shaped stone. Dejected, Aryan decides to leave the next day, but abandons his plan and departs immediately. Why? Because, the dead body of the robber has been found, murdered by an Irish national, sans the pot, but with some mysterious clues - the name of a book, a poem and a drawing of some kind, which directly relates to the Indian mythology. With help from Dr. Vats, Aryan knows he has to race against time to thwart his adversaries, who are hell bent on achieving what they want, along with handling his personal life mishaps. What is it Aryan is looking for? How does an Irish national fit into the scene? Who are the faceless people who are after the dangerous idea of enslaving the world? With the intermingling of present with the past, will Aryan succeed or will he be eliminated on the way?
Indian mythology has deep roots, deeper than we can even think. The Mahabharata alone accounts for innumerable theories/myths/facts, so as many number of books as there are today with this great epic as an inspiration, as many are the interpretation and plot lines. Though the stories might not be the same and have a particular aspect (say, a theory/myth/fact) chosen as the central theme, the characters and the outline are mostly similar - an antagonist (sometimes hidden in plain sight), a hero, a woman (she may or may not have an important role), a learned man/woman to enlighten the hero, and a couple of sidekicks along with mysterious locations - temples, forests, basements, etc. - might be within the country or out of it. This story is also one of them, I find it inspired by The Mahabharata series by Christopher C. Doyle, who in turn is inspired by Dan Brown style of storytelling, but still managed to grip me until I finished off the book in one sitting. I find these kind of books a group in themselves, like a Sherlock or a Poirot or a Jeeves, difference being just that instead of a character, they have a common source for themes.
Narrated in third person, the language is simple, with use of good vocab at places, and a flow that helps turn the pages more easily. It’s a typical thriller, the good chasing the bad, the murders, the race against time - a compelling read. Having been a fan of Dan Brown from the day I read his first book, it didn’t take me time to figure out who was the villain, the moment he was introduced. I kept up with the book for the explanations the author had to give in regards to The Mahabharata. There were few questions left unanswered - What was the metal used to make the cauldron? How had Mayasur survived all these years? How did Anand knew what he knew? If he knew so much, why had he missed on the Naga angle? The lack of references made it all seem hypothetical in context of the plot. The other thing is found missing was depth in the characters, I couldn’t relate to any one of them, except the suspense. It might be that a third person narrative is shallower than a first person one in terms of character building, but it definitely helps to stick to the plot and not lose focus off it. Suggested to those who enjoy mysteries, thrillers and have a likeness for the one of it’s kind epic.