This is a bible-study of James. I don't like the flavor of it, although I am trying really hard to appreciate it. The study is aimed towards women, and the author repeatedly calls the reader, "dear one." That is not my main complaint, although instead of endearing it feels belittling. I feel, even if this is not the author's heart or intention, that there is a cold push towards subservience and acceptance of suffering and mistreatment that does not ring as beautiful as the book of James. If a book is going to be geared toward women, who are already quite belittled by the world, already tend towards subservience, already tend to stay in abusive relationships, then the author should write in such a way that encourages and strengthens women to have the balance of both strength and humility.
For example, she highlights that James calls himself a slave of Jesus, and shows other places where the apostles call themselves a slave of Jesus. Cool. She also shows from other passages that James could have called himself something more dignified because Jesus says that we are his sister, mother, brother, etc. Those background verses are why I give this study a 2-star instead of a 1-star. Then she praises how humble James is and describes how a slave is obedient, etc. Then she encourages women to consider ourselves slaves like James. Women are already slaves and on the bottom rung of society. The bible does say to serve one another in love. But it also says that we were bought at a price and are very valuable to God, so we should not become slaves to men; and it also says that those who are slaves when they become Christians are freed (which I think is applicable to brow-beaten women). I think a better way to have done the introduction is to emphasize that the apostles, such as James, who called themselves slaves of Jesus, were leaders. Then, in the application, instead of just saying that all women should consider themselves slaves as James did, the bible-study should ask women to consider ways in which they exercise leadership and to consider how taking a model of service to God might transform that leadership.
I am also bothered by her offhandedly giving an example of trying to deal with a husband who is infatuated with a younger woman. I think she was trying to acknowledge something not always acknowledged among Christian circles, but it subtly sets the tone that such infidelity is to be expected and endured.
There is a tone of "you're going to have to suffer, so deal with." She does address hope somewhat, but with her insistence that I have to suffer, without sufficient emphasis on hope or what is produced by suffering, it just makes me irritated. She asserts that God is good, but his goodness is not really communicated in this study.
I am sorry to criticize this book so harshly, but when a book is teaching so many women, I think it is important to address these subtleties.