Though Lauren Green is obviously intelligent, it seems she is more of a journalist (providing provocative short stories/illustrations) than a book writer (who must employ the use of EDITING out illustrations to fit the book). Our women's group of about 60 women read this and, to a person, found it frustrating to follow and, for some, impossible to glean much. It was just generally confusing.
I had to read it through twice, taking notes throughout, in order to have an idea of a meta-narrative in order to teach this. Sometimes, she used the metaphor of a lighthouse for God with the light being those things which draw us to him. However, in the lighthouse analogy, the light is to let sailors know where the shore is, to help them navigate, but not to draw them to the actual lighthouse. Other times she uses the line of a building (foundation, walls...) to represent God. At first, I thought she was building a lighthouse, but then that didn't follow through. Other times, she referred to OUR light.
Though the individual illustrations were interesting, there were TOO MANY and they were not tied back to the main theme enough to create a "whole". Nor did the pieces of the whole ever get tied together. Many of the illustrations also were a stretch. To say that right angles makes crosses and therefore God has mathematically put these in to draw us to Himself is a bit of a stretch. To say the sight of the crosses formed reminds her of God would have been sufficient.
The most straightforward chapter was that on the vineyard where she gave steps that a vine must go through that directly applied to our faith.
I also began to wonder if the Tyndale editors even read the book with simple errors found, such as putting the burning bush on top of Mt. Sinai, or the idea that an egg and sperm have to "shed" DNA as a sacrifice when most 7th graders learn that eggs and sperms are unique cells that never have both halves of the DNA. Additionally, one of her theses said that we should see the triune in the world because "if God is indeed triune as Christian doctrine says, and the world is in God's image, then the whole of the world, too, would mirror those three parts". Unfortunately, the world is not in God's image. Humanity is. But her entire book is based on this false assumption.
I wholeheartedly believe God is not a distant concept. But it was not Green's book which led me there, nor was it crosses on buildings or seeing things in groups of three. I'm sure Ms. Green is an awesome person and a great reporter (she seems to go over and above on her research, but sadly I cannot recommend this book.