I appreciate his effort at synthesis, and I agree with much of it. But the book is badly marred by the usual librarian narrative: the journal publishing model is broken and must be abandoned and replaced with open access. He quotes a Huffington Post article that gives Elsevier and other publishers a profit margin about double what they really enjoy, as any quick check on yahoo finance or their publicly-available annual reports will show. Librarians do this all the time. If they don't know the difference between operating profit and net profit, fine-- but then they shouldn't write books about the wickedness of publishers. Lewis also lets slip the fact that universities spend about half of what they used to spend on libraries several decades ago (as a percentage of their overall budget). Over that time collections have grown enormously; my library's journal holdings have increased 60-fold in less than 20 years (not counting open-access titles). In other words, the current model is serving us very well, on the whole. But it's almost impossible to find a librarian who doesn't think something better than capitalism is always just around the corner.