I wish these textbooks would actually include essays that follow MLA guidelines. Even the student essays in this collection do not always have a Works Cited page, and I think they all should. Furthermore, because personal narrative-driven nonfiction tends to be more interesting to read, I'm glad that Clouse includes so many examples, and great ones too (including work by Alice Walker and others of her caliber) but then I have to tell my students, "No, you can't use first person when you write a persuasive-argumentative essay." What I found to be the most lacking, however, from this book was the fact it doesn't specifically cover the Literary Analysis. While it does include Critical Analysis, analyzing literature is its own particular beast--for example, you must always refer to the events in the story in present tense to honor the fact that fiction (and poetry) is timeless. I also disagree with the very first page of this book where Clouse states that critical reading and writing (essentially academic reading and writing) is more difficult than reading fiction. While it might not take a lot of thinking muscles to read a cheesy romance novel, it does take a lot of critical thinking to read books such as Mary Shelley's Frankenstein, or stories like "The Yellow Wallpaper" by Charlotte Perkins Gilman, or the poems of Emily Dickinson. In many ways, reading fiction with all its layers of meaning and allusions is far more hard to do than it is to read a straight-forward academic dissertation proclaiming that the ways in which women are protrayed in the media leads to violence against this gender.