What do you think?
Rate this book
A Scandal In Scarborough: The First Paget Brothers Mystery
Victorian Scarborough, 1899. A blazing hot summer. Brothers Sidney and Walter Paget, illustrators of the Sherlock Holmes stories in the Strand magazine, are holidaying in the Yorkshire resort when they discover the body of a naked man with a knife thrust deep into his ribs. As they are drawn into the case, murder follows upon murder, disappearance upon disappearance, until they can no longer be certain who is who or what is what. Inspector Brasher of Scotland Yard is called in to unravel the mystery and the brothers soon fall under suspicion. Can the spirit of Sherlock Holmes come to their rescue? This fast-moving historical whodunnit features quirky and sinister characters, humour and a good dose of sleaze, all unfolding in the delightful tourist spots of Scarborough.
- Genres19th Century
238 pages, Paperback
Published December 21, 2015
15 people are currently reading
39 people want to read
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 4 of 4 reviews
April 23, 2020
What a strange book. What a very odd book indeed. The premise is that Sidney Paget is the illustrator of the Sherlock Holmes stories in the Strand (true), a job he received accidentally – the publishers intended to hire his brother Walter (also true). Benedict Cumberbatch's Sherlock can blame Sidney for the deerstalker. Scandal in Scarborough begins with Sidney trying to help Walter stabilize a bit with a trip to the seaside, because, whether Walter became unbalanced after the wrong brother was hired or was always a bit loopy, he is most definitely a little unhinged now. It probably doesn’t help his state of mind that Sidney uses Walter as his model for the Great Detective (which he apparently denied).
Whatever the cause of the loopiness, Walter is compelled to fling himself into an investigation of a missing man he reads about in the newspaper. Having been used as the image of Holmes, being recognized by all and sundry as Holmes, he is under the impression that he can solve the disappearance. Sidney, naturally, tags along to try to contain him. He does not do a very good job, and is sucked into the sorry excuse for an investigation – though I suppose the "make assumptions and ask kind of random questions" style is rather accurate to what Doyle wrote, without the genius Holmes supposedly had.
These two brothers … Sidney proudly proclaims that before he illustrates a story, he actually reads the story. I marveled. I don't know, maybe habits among artists were different then, but … truly, this is nothing to brag about. It's common sense. He reproves his brother for playing detective, then goes off and investigates things on his own in hopes of being able to show Walter up, and then drags his feet about whether they should be involved, then spends hours trying to decode a message which … well, really, if he actually did read all the Sherlock Holmes stories as he claimed he ought to have cleared it up long before. And both he and his insane brother enjoy the whole thing far too much for a case in which bodies begin to pile up, including .
"In my heart of hearts I did not merely want to rein in Walter, I wanted to surpass him. I would decode the message and solve the crime – not just to bring my brother down a peg or two, which it undoubtedly would do, but to become myself the man of the moment, the hero of the hour…"
- Ass.
And I don't have enough time or patience to enumerate the number of ways in which Walter was a moron. Or mad … no, a moron. I haven't found much about the real Walter Paget online, but if he has descendants they should sue the author for every penny he has or is ever likely to have, because this depiction of him deserves to be kicked in the seat of the pants repeatedly, and then sent to Bedlam. I'm not sure why the author thought it would be cute to take the most annoying and boring habit of Holmes, that of saying "I know everything but I'm not going to tell you until I want to", and graft it onto this wanna-be, but he did, and it's even more exasperating than in the canon, simply because there's less excuse for it.
The writing became a little awkward at times, though it seemed to stick to its period pretty well. Still, the lighting fixture swaying above the dancers in that one chapter was a chandelier, not a candelabra. Sidney lapsed into visions or nightmares or something every now and then which reeked of sloppy writing more than anything else – unless they were supposed to demonstrate that both brothers needed psychiatric help. And the book also suffered from RealiltyShowItis – that tendency to, now and again, recap everything that has gone before for the inattentive reader.
I have to give credit where it's due for one thing: "Punch took up his slapstick". I never heard where slapstick comedy got its name before – so thanks for that.
I received this book through a LibraryThing Member Giveaway in exchange for an honest review.
ETA: The rating from this book just got knocked back from two stars to one due to the author's campaign on my blog to prove that a candelabra can also be a chandelier, according to the OED. I don’t have ready access to the OED, but:
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictio... (please note illustration)
http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/def...
http://www.thefreedictionary.com/cand... (please note illustration)
And just for fun, I did a Google image search for “candelabra”. Out of over 400 images on the screen, two are of hanging fixtures.
And now I hope never to read or type the word “candelabra” again.
Whatever the cause of the loopiness, Walter is compelled to fling himself into an investigation of a missing man he reads about in the newspaper. Having been used as the image of Holmes, being recognized by all and sundry as Holmes, he is under the impression that he can solve the disappearance. Sidney, naturally, tags along to try to contain him. He does not do a very good job, and is sucked into the sorry excuse for an investigation – though I suppose the "make assumptions and ask kind of random questions" style is rather accurate to what Doyle wrote, without the genius Holmes supposedly had.
These two brothers … Sidney proudly proclaims that before he illustrates a story, he actually reads the story. I marveled. I don't know, maybe habits among artists were different then, but … truly, this is nothing to brag about. It's common sense. He reproves his brother for playing detective, then goes off and investigates things on his own in hopes of being able to show Walter up, and then drags his feet about whether they should be involved, then spends hours trying to decode a message which … well, really, if he actually did read all the Sherlock Holmes stories as he claimed he ought to have cleared it up long before. And both he and his insane brother enjoy the whole thing far too much for a case in which bodies begin to pile up, including .
"In my heart of hearts I did not merely want to rein in Walter, I wanted to surpass him. I would decode the message and solve the crime – not just to bring my brother down a peg or two, which it undoubtedly would do, but to become myself the man of the moment, the hero of the hour…"
- Ass.
And I don't have enough time or patience to enumerate the number of ways in which Walter was a moron. Or mad … no, a moron. I haven't found much about the real Walter Paget online, but if he has descendants they should sue the author for every penny he has or is ever likely to have, because this depiction of him deserves to be kicked in the seat of the pants repeatedly, and then sent to Bedlam. I'm not sure why the author thought it would be cute to take the most annoying and boring habit of Holmes, that of saying "I know everything but I'm not going to tell you until I want to", and graft it onto this wanna-be, but he did, and it's even more exasperating than in the canon, simply because there's less excuse for it.
The writing became a little awkward at times, though it seemed to stick to its period pretty well. Still, the lighting fixture swaying above the dancers in that one chapter was a chandelier, not a candelabra. Sidney lapsed into visions or nightmares or something every now and then which reeked of sloppy writing more than anything else – unless they were supposed to demonstrate that both brothers needed psychiatric help. And the book also suffered from RealiltyShowItis – that tendency to, now and again, recap everything that has gone before for the inattentive reader.
I have to give credit where it's due for one thing: "Punch took up his slapstick". I never heard where slapstick comedy got its name before – so thanks for that.
I received this book through a LibraryThing Member Giveaway in exchange for an honest review.
ETA: The rating from this book just got knocked back from two stars to one due to the author's campaign on my blog to prove that a candelabra can also be a chandelier, according to the OED. I don’t have ready access to the OED, but:
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictio... (please note illustration)
http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/def...
http://www.thefreedictionary.com/cand... (please note illustration)
And just for fun, I did a Google image search for “candelabra”. Out of over 400 images on the screen, two are of hanging fixtures.
And now I hope never to read or type the word “candelabra” again.
February 4, 2020
1899 England murder/mystery
Brothers go on holiday to the seaside & end up solving a murder in a Holmesesc story. Great reading with a variety of interesting characters
Brothers go on holiday to the seaside & end up solving a murder in a Holmesesc story. Great reading with a variety of interesting characters
April 4, 2016
What an intriguing story!
Set in the Victorian era, it is a story about a lady called Miss Meakin whose fiance, Thomas, has seemingly disappeared without trace.
Two brothers Walter (who has delusions of Sherlock Holmes) and Sidney Paget, both illustrators for The Strand magazine (hence the Holmes analogy), get involved in searching for him.
A great old fashioned story worthy of the great man himself!
Very highly recommended.
I was given a digital copy of this book by the publisher David Publish in return for an honest unbiased review.
Set in the Victorian era, it is a story about a lady called Miss Meakin whose fiance, Thomas, has seemingly disappeared without trace.
Two brothers Walter (who has delusions of Sherlock Holmes) and Sidney Paget, both illustrators for The Strand magazine (hence the Holmes analogy), get involved in searching for him.
A great old fashioned story worthy of the great man himself!
Very highly recommended.
I was given a digital copy of this book by the publisher David Publish in return for an honest unbiased review.
April 10, 2016
Really enjoyed this book about a wannabe Sherlock Holmes. I loved the interplay between the brothers and the Victorian setting The plot had me guessing as I just could not work out why things were happening. Looking forward to reading more in this series and any others by this author.
Displaying 1 - 4 of 4 reviews