The sixteen official documents--constitutions, decrees, and declarations--of the Second Vatican Council are now available from Liturgical Press in the most popular and widely used inclusive-language edition translated by Irish Dominican Austin Flannery (+October 21, 2008). As the worldwide Church continues to celebrate the fiftieth anniversary of the Council (1962-65), there is a great need in college classrooms and parish faith formation groups--as well as for individuals--to again have access to these documents in contemporary English. As Flannery wrote in his introduction to the 1996 edition, "The translation of the texts of the Vatican documents in the present volume differs from that in the previous publication in two respects. It has been very considerably revised and, in place, corrected. It is also, to a very large extent, in inclusive language. "I say 'to a very large extent, ' because we have used inclusive language in passages about men and women but not, however, in passages about God, except where the use of the masculine pronoun was easily avoidable."
Pope Paul VI (Latin: Paulus VI; Italian: Paolo VI), born Giovanni Battista Enrico Antonio Maria Montini (26 September 1897 – 6 August 1978), reigned as Pope from 21 June 1963 to his death in 1978. Succeeding Pope John XXIII, he continued the Second Vatican Council which he closed in 1965, implementing its numerous reforms, and fostered improved ecumenical relations with Eastern Orthodox and Protestants, which resulted in many historic meetings and agreements. Montini served in the Vatican's Secretariat of State from 1922 to 1954. While in the Secretariat of State, Montini and Domenico Tardini were considered as the closest and most influential colleagues of Pope Pius XII, who in 1954 named him Archbishop of Milan, the largest Italian diocese. Montini automatically became the Secretary of the Italian Bishops Conference. John XXIII elevated him to the College of Cardinals in 1958, and after the death of John XXIII, Montini was considered one of his most likely successors.
Upon his election to the papacy, Montini took the pontifical name Paul VI (the first to take the name "Paul" since 1605) to indicate a renewed worldwide mission to spread the message of Christ, following the example of Apostle St. Paul.[citation needed] He re-convened the Second Vatican Council, which was automatically closed with the death of John XXIII, and gave it priority and direction. After the council had concluded its work, Paul VI took charge of the interpretation and implementation of its mandates, often walking a thin line between the conflicting expectations of various groups within Catholicism. The magnitude and depth of the reforms affecting all fields of Church life during his pontificate exceeded similar reform policies of his predecessors and successors. Paul VI was a Marian devotee, speaking repeatedly to Marian congresses and mariological meetings, visiting Marian shrines and issuing three Marian encyclicals. Following his famous predecessor Saint Ambrose of Milan, he named Mary as the Mother of the Church during the Second Vatican Council. Paul VI sought dialogue with the world, with other Christians, other religions, and atheists, excluding nobody. He saw himself as a humble servant for a suffering humanity and demanded significant changes of the rich in North America and Europe in favour of the poor in the Third World. His positions on birth control, promulgated most famously in the 1968 encyclical Humanae vitae, and other political issues, were often controversial, especially in Western Europe and North America.
Pope Benedict XVI declared that the late pontiff lived a life of heroic virtue and conferred the title of Venerable upon him. Pope Francis beatified him on 19 October 2014 after the recognition of a miracle attributed to his intercession. His liturgical feast is celebrated on the date of his birth on 26 September.
2022: Rereading for participation in/formation for Aspirant class next month.
2017: I know, I know, everyone says, you really should read the Documents of Vatican II. Well, yes, we should. We also should call mom, pay taxes, obey speed limits and do a lot of other things.
But if you are going to read any of the Documents from the Second Vatican Council, I suppose it is this one because it is about us—the Church, we the People of God, the Body of Christ. If you are like me, you don’t go around thinking of yourself like that very often, but maybe we should… And if you are going to read one chapter out of this Constitution—which is what it is called—read Chapter 4, The Laity. Here’s my favorite part: ‘Upon all the laity, therefore, rests the noble duty of working to extend the divine plan of salvation to all men of each epoch and in every land. … All their works, prayers and apostolic endeavors, their ordinary married and family life, their daily occupations, their physical and mental relaxation, if carried out in the Spirit, and even the hardships of life, if patiently borne-all these become "spiritual sacrifices acceptable to God through Jesus Christ". Together with the offering of the Lord's body, they are most fittingly offered in the celebration of the Eucharist. Thus, as those everywhere who adore in holy activity, the laity consecrate the world itself to God.’ (Italics mine.)
Chapter 5, The Universal Call to Holiness is pretty amazing too. Well really, why not read the whole thing?
Re-read 2020: Best read in company of Vatican II: Renewal Within Tradition by Matthew Levering and Matthew Lamb or similar commentary. Very useful for people wishing to get in touch with Vatican II documents and knowing what they really say.
Transformation by the love of Christ does not produce legalistic dogmas. Yes, this is a collection of Church dogmas, but it is evident that its authors have been genuinely transformed by God's love. Not God's hate (thank you, shawn, for your glorious insights on John 3:16). Not religious legalisms. These authors and thinkers have participated in something more essential to love and life than themselves, and their transformation invites its witnesses to the same.
These writings from Vatican II are necessarily precise. The time and attention devoted to the articulation of the innerworkings of the Church and the lives of the faithful convinces the reader of their vital role in God's divine dance. Lumen Gentium reveals that we all belong to God. We must assume our belonging, pick up the cross of our role in God's salvific work toward and within humanity, and glory in the love of our delightful Creator, Redeemer, and Sustainer.
thesis: YOU belong in God's mysterious being and doing
"...other religions found everywhere try to counter the restlessness of the human heart, each in its own manner, by proposing "ways," comprising teachings, rules of life, and sacred rites. The Catholic Church rejects nothing that is true and holy in these religions. She regards with sincere reverence those ways of conduct and of life, those precepts and teachings which, though differing in many aspects from the ones she holds and sets forth, nonetheless often reflect a ray of that Truth which enlightens all men... The Church, therefore, exhorts her sons, that through dialogue and collaboration with the followers of other religions, carried out with prudence and love and in witness to the Christian faith and life, they recognize, preserve and promote the good things, spiritual and moral, as well as the socio-cultural values found among these men."
This is basically an overview of all the parts (laity, religious, bishops, &c) of the church and the ways in which each is important, and how they should work together.
It definitely made me think, especially about bishops. I hadn't really thought much about a bishop's responsibilities--mostly, when I think about the bishop, I think about Confirmation, but he has so much more responsibility than that. He's the shepherd for all the faithful in his diocese, and the priests are his helpers. I hadn't really thought about it that way before.
(In the part about the laity, I was confused when they said that if the laity and priests worked together, it would be remarkably productive, and that was a bad paraphrase, but it confused me? Didn't they already? But in any case.)
I really liked the part on the religious calling. :)
The section on the faithful of the church as a whole (towards the beginning) made interesting points apropos of extra ecclasiam nulla salis, which made me nostalgic because I definitely quoted this document when I did my presentation on that concept for Confirmation class. :)
Lumen Gentium is THE document of Vatican 2 and my God it is beatifull, deep and to the point. It saddens me that way to many catholics are attackin Second Vatican Council because of missteps in implementation of these wise documents. I loved section about laiti and about Mother of God. Just read the whole document and you will be wiser.
Lumen Gentium is a Vatican II document that specifically lays out the teachings regarding the church herself. Explaining the purpose, mandate, and mission, we see the redemption of the world promised to Abraham completed in Christ's completed work at the cross and the resurrection as it is vivified by his body the whole church(the covenant people of God filled by the Holy Spirit).
Lumen Gentium gives a layout of the Catholic Church. It covers from the Pope to the Laity and everything in between. I plan to read this again because there is so much packed into this document that it is hard to take in with one reading.
All Christians should read this Constitution. It is what the Church is, was, and will be. It is not a scholarly theological discourse nor a second-grade catechism. It is a document that is easy to read in a language sense, although should not be read quickly. This document is preeminent of the documents of the Council, and is, again, a must read.
Good and clear layout of the form, function, and goal of the Church; I appreciated the elaboration on the universal call to holiness and the focus given to each type of member of the Body of Christ - particularly to the married laity.
Some of the wording in that same section may have been a bit too vague, though, which possibly led to an overstepping oh boundaries on the part of the laity to assist the clerics. I'm not sure, but I can see certain paragraphs being open to very liberal interpretations.
My theology professor did a very deep dive into this critical church document including a content analysis comparison between key chapters of Lumen Gentium from Vatican II with Pastor Aeternus from Vatican I. Superb. The exercise gave an understanding of both the history and the future of the Catholic Church.
A reminder of who is the Catholic Church and its mission on Earth to be the LIGHT for the people. The part about Virgin Mary gave me some new insights about her role as mother and guide to her most precious Son.
Having studied this more since the first time I read it, I can see now, what I did not at first and that is the ambiguous mines placed strategically in the document. We are now reaping what was sown, in my opinion, that is relativism, universalism, and lack of piety.