My edition of John Vanbrugh's The Relapse is in the New Mermaids series published Ernest Benn Limited and is edited by Bernard Harris. Harris provides a brief but insightful introduction which includes such fun facts as that John Vanbrugh was “the ninth child and first surviving son of the nineteen (!!) children of Giles and Elizabeth Vanbrugh”. Vanbrugh's grandfather was Flemish, a Protestant refugee. John Vanbrugh was not only a playwright but an architect, displaying an uncommon combination of talents. He was also a soldier.
The Relapse is a typical Restoration play, that is to say vivacious, absurd, hilarious, light-hearted, even when violence ensues. It is perhaps insufficiently recognised that much of Restoration drama is written in reaction to and repudiation of Jacobean and Elizabethan drama. We have moved from the Age of Spain, a fact which the Spanish critic Salvador de Madariaga famously stressed as being crucial in properly understanding Shakespeare's Hamlet, to the age of France, from repression, puritanism and revenge tragedy to display, concealment, immoralism and farce. Sexuality is more important than love (in Shakespeare for example the reverse is true) and revenge and resentment are regarded as characteristic of low minds. Gentlemen and ladies move on. The Restoration memory, in stark contrast to the Jacobean memory, is a short one.
The principle plot of The Relapse concerns the efforts by two brothers, Loveless and Sir Foppington (the contrast between two brothers a persiflage of Shakespeare's King Lear perhaps) for fortune and standing and that of course includes marrying the woman most advantageous in that respect. Vanburgh's views on love and marriage and the relationship between the sexes is very cynical. Love and duty are merely instruments or charades.
Both in their time and subsequently, Restoration dramatists have been accused of offending morality and in his introduction Bernard Harris gives an account of the dispute and rivalry between John Vanbrugh and one Colley Cibber concerning the morality of drama. Harris writes
“Collier was what Laurence Whistler (Sir John Vanbrugh, Architect and Dramatist-1938) has called an example of that curious and undesirable type, the high-church Puritan”. It seems that Cibber was keen to take drama in the direction of the sentimental and didactic. Restoration comedy was primarily concerned with providing entertainment free of moral conundra. The Relapse, a typical Restoration drama, is brutally realistic about the driving force are sexual appetite, pecuniary interest and social standing. The play, it seems to me, is closer to the spirit of the 1970's than to that of the 2020's and I suspect that revived Restoration drama would probably come under pressure to censor characters such as Lord Foppington and Loveless more severely than the author probably intended. It is worth noting that Lord Foppington, the elder brother who suffers unjust indignities, not comparable to be sure to those suffered by Edgar in King Lear; nevertheless his is ambushed, bound and thrown into a cellar when he appears as a suitor and is mistaken for a “stroller” suffers this injustice without great resentment.
In our day and age, where everyone expects to be treated with scrupulous respect, his treatment would have been followed by a flurry of charges and indemnity claims made by his lawyers on his behalf.
Don't take anything too seriously is the underlying message of the play but it is of course true that the play will have no truck with any serious matter, poverty, famine, exploitation, slavery, fiscal corruption and other scourges of the time.
“The greatness of your necessities..is the worst argument in the world for your being personally heard” as Sir Foppington himself puts it when his brother applies to him for financial assistance. As for the notion clearly conveyed in this play, that women enjoy slap and tickle even when they protest for the sake of appearances that they do not, as for example when Loveless seduces the willing/unwilling Berinthia, this would not be tolerated for a moment in real life by the amazons of the contemporary metoo generation.
Dramatically, the play works extremely well, moving forward at an exciting pace, each act with many short scenes, outrage, anger and intrigue reduced from their perilous dimension in Jacobean and Elizabethan drama to the occasion for hilarity, farce and a vivacious and rapid dialogue.
Here is an extract from the hilarious scene ( Act IV Scene VI) when Lord Foppington visits Sir Tunbelly to marry the good man's daughter and is mistaken only to be mistakern for a "stroller"
Sir Tunbelly Come, bring him along, bring him along !
Lord Foppingtom What the pax do you mean, gentlemen ! Is it fair-time, that you are all drunk before dinner ?
Sir Tunbelly Drunk, sirrah ! Here's an impudent rogue for you ! Drunk or sober, bully, I'm a justice of the peace, and know how to deal with strollers.
Lord Foppington Strollers !
John Vanbrugh's The Relapse is an exubert entertainment and distraction from the sombre mood of these early 2020's, a paly in which "infection" means not some bitrre apocalyptic made in China virus, but the sudden twinge of the libido.
Berenthia (Breaking from him)
Oh Lard, let me go! 'Tis the palgue and we shall all be infected.
Loveless (Catching her in his arms, and kissing her)
Then we'll die together, my charming angel!
Berenthia
Oh God-the devil's in you! Lord, let me go, here's somebody coming.
For those born before 1960, this play written and first performed centuries ago, might evoke nostalgic memories of the amoral, superfiical, lively and adventurous time of younger days, when missionary earnestness and a constant fear of dying were considered weaknesses, not virtues.