I thought I could suspend disbelief to get down with the mode of gendering this book is based on, at least for the length of this one book. I was wrong. Is it really necessary to be stereotypically chatty to invoke experiences (some) women share as a group? My main issue with it were the myriad little ways in which the book (despite repeatedly claiming the opposite) seems to advocate a very particular femininity and makes far-reaching assumptions about what women who identify with such a femininity may want to have or be. It feels dated and problematic to appeal to professional women to embrace and capitalise on their highly privileged and heteronormative femininity to define and reach career goals. As a result, it reads as yet another attempt at diverting attention from structural inequalities at the workplace by placing the labour of mitigating against them on individual women and their career choices and coping strategies. Step up. Lean in. And so on.
What I did appreciate about the book are its efforts at staying conversational, the use of easily accessible examples, and that it provides small exercises to get readers into a habit of practising what the book preaches (even if I personally can't get behind what that is).