“Jesus found solidarity with the poor, with the oppressed, with vulnerable women, with the socially rejected and marginalized, with ethnic Samaritan outcasts, with the demon-possessed, and with the blind or physically sick… He protected those charged with sexual sin from the punishment of the religious leaders, shared life intimately with tax collectors and violent insurrectionists, and invited each of them to follow him into new life” (p. 62).
This is nothing new. This has always been Jesus. How has he been transformed so egregiously falsely into a white, hateful, judgmental man?
Please read this book.
On those “poor, disadvantaged people in the ‘hood” that white people always talk about, how about taking some accountability?
“If there are systemically disadvantaged people, then there must be over-advantaged people. How often do we talk about particular people and communities as “over-advantaged”? We feel free to talk about how someone is from a “disadvantaged” neighborhood or school, but we do it as though that community lives in a social vacuum. It is as though someone just happens to be structurally disadvantaged… We can begin an honest assessment of the situation only when we acknowledge this fact: the systemic advantages from which you unconsciously benefit are simultaneously harmful to someone else” (p. 104).
A bit about the author: Drew G.I. Hart is a black man who, at the time of writing this (2016) had received his Mdiv and was working towards his doctorate. A quick Google search told me the following update: Drew G. I. Hart is a theology professor in the Bible and Religion department at Messiah College with ten years of pastoral experience. Hart majored in Biblical Studies at Messiah College as an undergrad, he attained his MDiv with an urban concentration from Biblical Theological Seminary, and he received his PhD in theology and ethics from Lutheran Theological Seminary-Philadelphia.
Buckle up because I’m throwing another review your way that will be filled almost solely with quotes. When it comes to books like these, I don’t feel as though my personal words can contribute any more than what this author has laid out for the reader so here it goes…
“Just trying to start a conversation about racism in the church - which I am determined to do - often results in defensive and even antagonistic dismissal by some of my white brothers and sisters. Having two-way conversations on racism is challenging when white people respond to discomfort with either defensive emotionalism or white fragility, which is the inability to deal with stressful racialized situations. These responses are the norm in too many Christian communities” (p. 21).
Another fact I have seen over and over again: “Current research… reveals that black youth and white youth are using and selling drugs at comparable rates, and yet stereotypes run wild within dominant cultural discourse that make people assume otherwise.” (p. 22)
“I can personally attest that the war on drugs is not being carried out in white middle-class communities. When white youth use or sell drugs, they are seen as ‘experimenting’ or ‘going through a stage.’ When black youth engage in the exact same actions, they are seen as destroying the fabric of American values. This results in our society putting one in every three African American males through the criminal justice system at some point in their lives (mostly for these nonviolent drug offenses)” (p. 23).
“Some of these white friends of mine would pull out the old ‘you are different from them’ rhetoric. It was as if our friendship had no bearing on breaking their stereotypes of other black students at all. In their racial framework, I was the exception to the rule that allowed them to gaze at other black students as thugs or charity cases.They must not have even thought that there was a possibility that the way they were socialized to see black people was distorted, or that their racial lenses were the actual problem rather than black and brown students. The reality that I was no different than the students of color to whom they were comparing me” (p. 40).
There is an incredible section on the false notion of folks ‘playing the race card’ which I will be unable to succinctly describe, but is so worthwhile to read so please read this book!
“Many white Americans focus on an individual card rather than attempt to make sense of how that card fits into the larger deck. So you want to play cards? Well, let’s fix the rules of the game and recognize that black people aren’t playing the race card. Typically dominant society has been consumed by a single card while most people in the African American community have been working with the entire racialized deck. And what we have always known is that the deck is stacked against us” (p. 48).
Black people are NOT playing a race “card”. They are working with an entire deck of racism.
Another fact that I’ve heard repeated several times: “race is not a natural biological category for human beings, though physical features certainly create boundaries for difference. The language of race obscures rather than clarifies human similarity and difference. It is smoke and mirrors. Instead of being a biological fact, race is a social construct” (p. 48).
Yes, you heard that correctly. Race is NOT a biological factor. It has been created, as a social construct, to ensure that white people always remain on the top of social orders.
Another fact I’ve heard repeated several times: White women have benefited more from Affirmative Action more than ANY other group of people. (see p. 54 or Jesse Daniels’ article “White Women and Affirmative Action: Prime Beneficiaries and Opponents”)
On how it felt as a black person to see Jesus as white:
“From the outset, almost everywhere we blacks have met him in this land, this Christ was painted white and pink, blonde and blue-eyed - and not only in white churches, but in black churches as well. Millions of black children had the picture of this pseudo-Nazarene burned into their memory… a message of shame. This Christ shamed us by his pigmentation, so obviously not our own” (p. 58).
Hart reports further on how Jesus was transformed into a white man starting on page 110.
Just in case you’d forgotten:
“Jesus was Jewish rather than a white man, poor rather than some wealthy elite, and part of an oppressed minority living under occupation rather than one domineering over others in the sociopolitical realm. Jesus was among ‘the disinherited,’ an obvious feature of the Jesus story for those open to seeing and hearing. After we discard the white, elite, Western Jesus, a human constructed for sociopolitical domination, we open ourselves up to the divine revelation of the poor, oppressed, Jewish and ultimately crucified Messiah. And in a life of discipleship, we will find the way that can dismantle and dis-align the racial hierarchy and order upon which our lives are built” (p. 59).
“I can remember many times that white people have said to me things like ‘I don’t have a culture’ or ‘I’m just a ‘normal’ American.’ They assume that their interpretations of the world are the purely objective and universal perspectives that everyone else should adopt. Not being conscious of one’s own cultural socialization can lead to thinking that one’s perspective is not just a vantage point but the vantage point. Not recognizing that everyone has been socialized by society quickly results in assuming that our way is the right way, and hence God’s way. In America, the white dominant cultural way is often assumed to be the right way. The culture, values, and norms of the dominant group get translated into the universally right and moral way of life” (p. 78).
Hart describes that white racism goes beyond the typical KKK image and permeates the furthest and most harmfully within those white people who are seen by other whites as really pretty nice!
“...for many white people, black people in general are still lazy, less smart, threatening, and immoral - even as they perceive that there are exceptional black people they know personally who don’t fit that description. And these aren’t the mean and nasty folks we are talking about; these are often extremely nice white people” (p. 107).
“Most American Christians and others would now easily agree with the African perspective of the time and would claim that the African slaves got it right” (p. 80). However, when white people are questioned about injustices happening at this very moment, we tend to get uncomfortable (myself included). It is easy to look back on slavery, Jim Crow, segregation and say “oh yeah, that was obviously awful. I can’t believe those people back then letting that happen.” But what about injustices happening right now?? Hart says, “Being a product of one’s time does not absolve anyone. We are all people of our time. We either renew our minds and become transformed or we conform to the dominant ideologies that convince us that we are moral despite what is going on around us” (p. 80).
Hart describes the life of MLK in a new way on pages 91-96 that you can’t miss. Please read this book!
Hart on why “colorblindness” is not in any way effective or helpful:
“Ironically, dominant society will proclaim colorblindness at one moment and then the next moment will have no problem calling out ‘black-on-black violence’ instead of just seeing it as human-on-human violence. When something is believed to be problematic in African American communities, colorblind rhetoric disappears and blackness is quickly named without reserve. I have never heard anyone talk about the problem of ‘white-on-white violence’ even though, according to statistics, this type of violence occurs at very similar rates as that of black-on-black violence” (p. 100).
On government “hand-outs” and the fact that “Welfare Queens” are always black women:
“White Americans have benefitted from some of the largest government handouts in history (beyond, of course, the stolen land and stolen labor). And even for those who have not directly received any of those white benefits, just being white meant access to live in, do business with, and benefit from communities that had created their wealth through such racially stratified and oppressive practices and policies” (p. 103)
Further resources for anyone interested:
The book essentially begins with a brief chronology of people who have been killed, in all actuality, for being black, and a short description of what occurred at the scene of the crime. I have listed them and included the dates in case you would like to look any of these events up and further educate yourself on the overt racism used in each situation.
Michael Donald (1981), Rodney King (1991), James Byrd Jr. (1998), Amadou Diallo (1999), Sean Bell (2006), Oscar Grant (2009), Aiyana Stanley-Jones (2010), Trayvon Martin (2012), Rekia Boyd (2012), Jordan Davis (2012), Renisha McBride (2013), Eric Garner (2014), Michael Brown (2014), Tamir Rice (2014), Walter Scott (2015), Freddie Gray (2015).
The Clark doll experiments:
“In these tests, young black and white children, one at a time, answered a series of questions. A white doll and a black doll sat in front of the child during the exercise. An interviewer would ask the child things like ‘Which doll is the good doll?’ and ‘Which doll is the bad doll?’ Other questions included ‘Which doll is the pretty doll’ and ‘Which doll is the ugly one?’” (p. 123).
As you might have guessed, white children pointed to the white doll as good, pretty, anything positive. The enormous, mind-blowing moment of the experiment occurred when black children also answered that the white dolls were better. Thus the earth-shattering enormity and transformative power of racism and prejudice.