Sandefur's perspective is that many rights such as privacy, freedom of association, and freedom from government discrimination of minorities stems from strong property rights. He outlines the threats to property rights beyond eminent domain, such as zoning, civil forfeiture, and condemnation under overly flexible "blight" definitions.
Although I agree with many of his points, he often supports them with little more than anecdotes or "proof by repeated assertion." Definitely an evangelical point of view that makes appeals to authority of the founding fathers rather than making its own arguments. Lots of the same rhetorical techniques as Thomas Sowell's "Basic Economics," such as asserting points without support and inoculating readers against dissenting views, and redefining "greed" so that it is a virtue.