Overall decent essays. but they are a little unbalanced–some are very specific, some general, some very historical, some technical. Some focus on a particular person (The themes of John Witherspoon, say) without much reference to his Presbyterianism or how his thought was relevant to Presbyterianism, and some focus entirely on Presbyterianism. I understand that these are essays by different scholars from different theological viewpoints, but still.
Another possible quibble is that certain themes (Adopting Act, Log College) are repeated in similar ways that I think could have been avoided. I don't know if this is an editing issue or endemic to the freedom of each author to decide what to write and the editors desire to preserve that freedom.
Overall, decent essays about foundational issues in the colonial Presbyterian church. The most enlightening was C.N. Wilborn's on the Pietism and its negative influence via Gilbert Tennant. Dr. Fortson's article on the Adopting act was also instructive.
In general, the New Side/Old Side controversy over the Great Awakening should serve as a case study of how the Work of the Holy Spirit should be viewed. Issues like Continuitionism are not modern issues, they just pop up every few hundred years, ever since the Montanist controversy in the 3rd century!
A couple typos in the paperback edition, 2007: page 30 (no comma after Clowney) and page 113 (identify).