Jump to ratings and reviews
Rate this book

In the Moment of Greatest Calamity: Terrorism, Grief, and a Victim's Quest for Justice

Rate this book
On August 7, 1998, bombs exploded at two United States embassies in East Africa. American anthropologist Susan Hirsch and her husband Jamal, a Kenyan, were among the thousands of victims, and Jamal died. From there, Hirsch went on to face devastating grief with the help of friends and families on two continents, observing the mourning rituals of her husband's community to honor him. When the alleged bombers were captured and sent to New York to stand trial, she witnessed firsthand the attempts of America's criminal justice system to handle terrorism through the law.



In the Moment of Greatest Calamity is her story--a tale told on many personal, anthropological, legal, and, finally, political. The book's central chapters describe Hirsch's experience of the bombing trials in a Manhattan federal court in 2001, including a behind-the-scenes look at the investigation leading up to the trial, encounters with some of the FBI's leading terrorism investigators, and many moments of drama from the proceedings themselves. Hirsch reveals the inner conflict that results from her opposition to the death penalty and concludes that the trial was both flawed and indispensable.



Hirsch's story of this tragedy and its legal aftermath comes to life through--and is enhanced by--her skills as a social scientist. Her unique viewpoint makes it unlike any other story about terrorism.

336 pages, Hardcover

First published September 18, 2006

21 people want to read

About the author

Susan F. Hirsch

14 books1 follower

Ratings & Reviews

What do you think?
Rate this book

Friends & Following

Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!

Community Reviews

5 stars
1 (5%)
4 stars
7 (41%)
3 stars
7 (41%)
2 stars
2 (11%)
1 star
0 (0%)
Displaying 1 of 1 review
18 reviews1 follower
January 3, 2010
The author goes to great extent to argue that this book is not about her personal story or journey toward healing, when in fact it is clearly, primarily, about her own personal healing. I think it would have been bolder of her to argue for the legitimacy of her personal experience and celebrate her lack of objectivity while making some valid and critical observations. Put the screws to the patriarchal version of " objective science." I think if the book would have been framed more honestly in this regard I could have appreciated it more. In addition to an honest framing, I think in discussing what has been helpful to her as she has tried to heal she could acknowledge the structures that are not in place to acknowledge injustice and memorialize victims of many other forms of terror.
Displaying 1 of 1 review

Can't find what you're looking for?

Get help and learn more about the design.