DISCLAIMER: I am largely unaware of Ed Shaw's movements, if any, since 2015 when this title was published. His approving treatment of "Side-B" proponent Wes Hill (who wrote a blurb for the book) won't come into view as I review the content here.
Shaw's work here is good. It is best at attacking the cultural notions that undergird and render persuasive the secular sexual ethic. His perspective, as a Same-Sex Attracted man, is particularly powerful as he brings receipts with him.
His work is fundamentally apologetic, which explains his book's subtitle: "The Surprising Plausibility of the Celibate Life." He is not suggesting, as I take him, to be saying that celibacy is otherwise implausible, but that it seems implausible to our culture given their priors.
Shaw eschews "gay Christian" language, noting rightly that to don an identity aside from Christ is sin. He uses SSA language to differentiate himself from that fraught association.
Shaw identifies desires as disordered, making no excuses for them. His rationale is undergirded by the doctrine of original sin. Even things we didn't choose, he argues, we are culpable for before God.
There are, however, some awkwardnesses.
Shaw tends to view same-sex attraction as immutable. This is his experience, but he doesn't seem very sanguine about the prospects of seeing any change in this respect (though he does acknowledge that others have seen change).
He further describes his own yearnings in terms that I personally would have left alone. These are infrequent, though, and simply make for uncomfortable reading while not being objectively incorrect or unfactual, as far as I can tell.
Next, he seems to agree with Christian psychologist William Struthers that "our sex drives are not just lessened by sexual intimacy; they can be satisfied by non-sexual intimacy, by friendship too" (77). Here, Shaw was encouraging readers to find outlets for the intimacy the Bible seems to expect us to desire in mere friendship. He's not arguing, to be clear, for celibate cohabitation, but rather to mitigate sexual impulses with platonic friendships.
Last, Shaw largely avoids strategies for fighting desires. While this may be a result of the scope of his book, he spends a ton of time dissecting desires theologically and informing those desires with a theology of suffering (good job here!), the upshot of his counsel seems to be "if you are same-sex attracted, it's going to be a long road, so prepare to suffer." Make no mistake, this is a needed word today. But it's not all that can be said, I think.
All in all, a good correction to our culture's narrative on sexual desire and identity.