Jump to ratings and reviews
Rate this book

Hannibal: Rome's Greatest Enemy

Rate this book
Hannibal's enduring reputation as a man and as a general is due to his enemies' fascination with him. The way his legend was shaped in the Greek and Roman consciousness is one of the book's main themes. Under Hannibal's leadership, Carthage came close to dominating the western Mediterranean; his total victory would have changed the course of history. That he was a brilliant general is unquestioned and his strategy and tactics have been studied as real-life lessons in war even into the modern era (Norman Schwartzkopf is a fan). His political career is less appreciated and his achievements as civilian leader of Carthage in 196-5 BC have been virtually overlooked. The issue of whether he might indeed have changed history had he postponed conflict with Rome and concentrated first on Carthage's own prosperity and safety is explored in this volume as vigorously as the military questions.

176 pages, Paperback

First published July 1, 2007

1 person is currently reading
49 people want to read

About the author

Dexter Hoyos

23 books7 followers
Dexter Hoyos is retired Associate Professor of Classics and Ancient History at the University of Sydney, Australia. His many books include, most recently, Hannibal: Rome's Greatest Enemy, The Carthaginians, A Companion to the Punic Wars, Livy: Rome's Italian Wars (with J. C. Yardley), and A Companion to Roman Imperialism.

Ratings & Reviews

What do you think?
Rate this book

Friends & Following

Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!

Community Reviews

5 stars
4 (25%)
4 stars
9 (56%)
3 stars
3 (18%)
2 stars
0 (0%)
1 star
0 (0%)
Displaying 1 of 1 review
63 reviews2 followers
December 31, 2018
A perceptive biography of Hannibal. Most interestingly, it is told from a sort of "Carthaginian" point of view, with a focus on the internal workings of Carthage as well as avoiding an entirely Rome-centric view of Hannibal's career (i.e. Trebia, Trasimene, and Cannae are "victories", not defeats). Although sympathetic to Hannibal, Hoyos is unsycophantic and delivers balanced, and unwavering assessment and critique. Some of the conclusions could have been elaborated somewhat, but they were likely abbreviated due to the book's length/less academically-inclined audience. Stil, Hoyos does not fail to interrogate the source material and other historians' views.
Displaying 1 of 1 review

Can't find what you're looking for?

Get help and learn more about the design.