What do you think?


Thinking Gender
Feminist Contentions: A Philosophical Exchange
This unique volume presents a debate between four of the top feminist theorists in the US today, discussing the key questions facing contemporary feminist theory, responding to each other, and distinguishing their views from others.
182 pages, Paperback
First published December 14, 1994
About the author
Nancy Fraser
108 books482 followersNancy Fraser is an American critical theorist, currently the Henry A. and Louise Loeb Professor of Political and Social Science and professor of philosophy at The New School in New York City. Fraser earned her PhD in philosophy from the CUNY Graduate Center and taught in the philosophy department at Northwestern University for many years before moving to the New School.
Librarian Note: There is more than one author with this name in the Goodreads database.
See also: Romance author Nancy Fraser
Librarian Note: There is more than one author with this name in the Goodreads database.
See also: Romance author Nancy Fraser
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 6 of 6 reviews
August 15, 2018
Interesting structure where four theorists give papers on the overlap between feminism and postmodernism, then respond to one another through criticism and adaptation of theories. Some excellent presentation on the difficulties of retaining a 'female' perspective in a society where identity is individualistic; competing opinions from psychology (Cornell) to philosophy (Butler) to social theory (Benhabib) that come together in the chapters of criticism. Difficult to read (some jargon, and some heavy theory) but worth the time.
June 13, 2020
Geht generell darum, was kann der Feminismus mit der Postmoderne anfangen. Aber mehr als ,,Kritik braucht feste Kriterien"(Benhabib), ,,Wir müssen die Kriterien der Kritik selber hinterfragen"(Butler) ,,Phallusse!" (Cornell) und ,,Wir müssen das alles pragmatisch angehen"(Fraser) konnte ich nicht daraus mitnehmen. Die Texte sind unglaublich schwer lesbar, nahezu rätselhaft, v.a. von Cornell.
Read
February 14, 2023dnf'isin kuskil kolmandiku peal. ma ei suuda uskuda, et ma seda praegu ütlen, aga minu maitse jaoks liiga palju filosoofiat ja liiga vähe päris elu. filosoofiline mõttevahetus on tore, aga selle võiks kuidagi reaalse olukorraga ka ikka siduda
April 11, 2026
senden de alacağımı aldım.
September 26, 2011
Read this again recently. Great example of the debate among contemporary feminist theorists as to whether feminism can accept postmodern/poststructuralist notions of the self and politics.
Judith Butler owns it in this one. Such a fun read.
Judith Butler owns it in this one. Such a fun read.
November 11, 2015
Serious and important!
I especially like the question Nancy Fraser poses: "Can we construct practices, institutions and forms of life in which the empowerment of some does not entail the disempowerment of others? If not, what is the point of feminist struggle?"
I especially like the question Nancy Fraser poses: "Can we construct practices, institutions and forms of life in which the empowerment of some does not entail the disempowerment of others? If not, what is the point of feminist struggle?"
Displaying 1 - 6 of 6 reviews







