Hoehner's work on the letter to the Ephesians is impressive in scope. It is also worth the price for the the lengthy list of recommended reading that accompanies the book's introduction.
The question of scope lends itself to the question of depth. Hoehner applies a sort of old school approach (for lack of a better description) to this commentary, even has he speaks to the issues we find in modern scholarship. It is a slow, prodding approach verse by verse that is littered with side trips (in small print) where he feels it is warranted.
Having just finished a commentary on the letter of James (different author), a part of my own personal journey was recognizing some of the overlap from James to Paul. Similar to James, Hoehner makes a compelling argument for an earlier composition (based on the growing recognition of a strong Semitic background). The themes are also compelling, finding overlap in the discussion of "riches" and "justification" and "power". In the grander picture I had always pictured James as a sort of rough around the edges introduction in to Paul's own thought process. In Ephesians we get a picture of these shared themes really taking root.
There is no question that Paul is concerned with unity of the early Church. Through the first three chapters we see his passionate insistence on growing our view of the world, our view of God's work in the world. We see his commitment to pulling together Jew and Gentile under the unifying work and person of Jesus. In fact, we find this movement towards a unifying body the very essence of the "mystery" that follows Paul's letters. This mystery is the truth of God's grace that says we can (across ethnic, cultural and social systems) belong as adopted sons and daughters in to the family of God not by our own merit, but through the person and work of Jesus. For Paul we are given the power and strength and knowledge that we need to understand this mystery, the mystery that the love of Christ knows no boundaries.
I was fascinated by the theme of family in the book of Ephesians, something Hoehner helps to bring to light. From 1:5 (which speaks of our adoption in to the family of God), the theme of unity pushes forward in to a grand picture of being "built together" in to one body of brothers and sisters. Understanding the intentional use of the word for "Father" in the NT (by Paul), we see this sentiment as one that is near and dear to his own heart. There is a powerful moment in chapter 3:14 when Paul speaks of God actively "naming" every family in Heaven and on earth. This was particularly meaningful for me, and the first time that I had really read this verse, as the father of an adopted child. Paul sees the "family" in a variety of forms, all of which find their meaning in being "rooted and grounded in love (the work and person of Christ)".
It is interesting that the latter chapters, which deal with the household structure as the picture of HOW to live as a family simply serve this theme of family, providing perhaps a new lens through which to read the chapters on submission and slavery. Here Hoehner gives some good feedback (although I would have pushed some of his thoughts a bit further, particularly regarding the extent to which Paul is borrowing the household structure from the Greco-Roman context), and allows us to see how these verses in context to Paul's bigger picture of the mystery of God. In the end, this focus on the relationships within the family provide a picture of God's unifying work across boundaries and across roles, structures and culture. This is a mystery that is made known through humility, not power, servanthood and grace and not judgment and exclusion.
Lastly, I found myself intrigued by the final chapter on the armour of God. This is the first of the recommended reading that I plan to pick up (along with his material on adoption and the household structure in the ancient world). Paul has a distinct connection with the mystics. He speaks of the spiritual powers, and the unseen world quite often, and it is easy to arrive at the final chapter and paint him as more practical than romantic. He has a close connection to the spiritual elements that undergird Christian theology, and I am intrigued to discover more about these elements of his teaching.
Hoehner gives us close to 900 pages, which would appear to be overkill given the size of the letter itself. And in truth, some of what he does offer here does feel a bit over the top. And as with most commentaries, there is always a bit of theological baggage that the author carries with them in to the conversation. With Hoehner you begin to figure out his rhythm and patter early on (he typically pairs views in groups of three or more, with the one he gives his strongest support to being the last one to be referenced). He does present a somewhat biased Calvinist slant. But for the most part he gives us a good overview of the general issues in play over the particular passage. The only thing I might feel was lacking were some chances to catch our breathe and to become re-aquainted with the larger picture of the book itself.