"Clearly, whether or not the conclusion of an argument logically follows from the premises is not simply a matter of the truth or falsity of the premises and conclusion. Rather, as we shall see in detail, the correctness of the argument depends on the form of the statements that make up the argument: the way those statements are constructed from smaller parts, some of which will occur multiply in those statements."
For the most part, Goldfarb's introductory treatment of symbolic logic maintains its clarity even as it delves deeper into the subject matter. My biggest problem with this text is that it offers no solutions for the sample problems presented in the back. Practice problems are considerably more useful when you can check your work. That's why we have teachers, I suppose.