What do you think?
Rate this book
A Tale of Three Kings: A Study in Brokenness
For the many Christians who have experienced pain, loss, and heartache at the hands of other believers, this compelling story offers comfort, healing, and hope. Christian leaders and directors of religious movements throughout the world have recommended this simple, powerful, and beautiful story to their members and staff. You will want to join the thousands who have been profoundly touched by this incomparable story.
105 pages, Paperback
First published January 1, 1980
833 people are currently reading
5632 people want to read
About the author
Gene Edwards
134 books272 followersGene Edwards is one of America's most beloved Christian authors. He has published over 25 best-selling books, and his signature work, "The Divine Romance," has been called a masterpiece of Christian literature. He has written biblical fiction covering nearly the entire Bible, with titles that include the following: "The Beginning," "The Escape," "The Birth," "The Divine Romance," "The Triumph," "Revolution," "The Silas Diary," "The Titus Diary," "The Timothy Diary," "The Priscilla Diary," "The Gaius Diary," and "The Return."
Gene grew up in the East Texas oil fields and entered college at the age of 15. He graduated from East Texas State University at 18 with a bachelor's degree in English history and received his M.Div. from Southwestern Baptist Theological Seminary. Gene is part of the house-church movement, and he travels extensively to aid Christians as they begin meeting in homes rather than in church buildings. He also conducts conferences on living the deeper Christian life.
Gene and his wife, Helen, reside in Jacksonville, Florida, and have two grown children.
Gene grew up in the East Texas oil fields and entered college at the age of 15. He graduated from East Texas State University at 18 with a bachelor's degree in English history and received his M.Div. from Southwestern Baptist Theological Seminary. Gene is part of the house-church movement, and he travels extensively to aid Christians as they begin meeting in homes rather than in church buildings. He also conducts conferences on living the deeper Christian life.
Gene and his wife, Helen, reside in Jacksonville, Florida, and have two grown children.
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 30 of 1,114 reviews
April 12, 2014
I will say, up front, that this book does not offer any hope for those who have been “broken” or wounded by authoritative pastors. Instead, it proposes a kind of catch-22 for those within the church who are questioning the abuses of their pastors. It makes sense that this book was brought to my attention by a person who was given it by her pastor. It also alarms me to read so many reviews on Goodreads where pastors are handing these books out to the congregation. Doesn’t anybody ever wonder why pastors spend so much time and money pushing books to read that support their authority and discourage those who dissent?
I have read a long list of books dealing with disagreements, disillusion, and splits in churches. It seems that these things happen quite regularly; otherwise there wouldn’t be any market to entice publishers to print so many of these books. Unfortunately, most of them are written by pastors who are obviously writing from the side of the person demanding authority over his disenchanted followers. Is this one of those books? Maybe it is. Maybe it isn’t. I could say, like the writer, that only God knows.
No. I’m just going to come out and say it. The evil of this book is its appeal. It is appealing to broken people. It appeals to the people who feel like Joseph in Pharaoh’s dungeon—waiting and hoping that God will vindicate them, will make good of all the injustices—but just rotting away in the meantime. We pick up this book wanting to know why all the bad things happened in our lives. Why people had to die. Why our dreams had to fail. Why every time we try to do the right thing we get the crap kicked out of us… and then we have to suffer the injustice of watching the guy who “broke” us succeed at his own vile agenda. The author describes our wounds so well, we feel as though he is speaking directly to us. Then he tells us that we are wrong to feel wounded. He tells us that we should not take action against our transgressors—not even speak up to point out their transgressions. In fact, he tells us we should hang in there and let ourselves be abused by the tyrannical pastor (never once pointing out that he might be one such pastor) until we are so broken and worn out that we just can’t take any more. And then, to ensure that we do not deprive our oppressor of his other victims, the author tells us we need to leave…alone. As in don’t try to liberate anybody else from the oppressor. Don’t try to bring the brute to justice. Don’t try to keep anybody else from being as hurt as you (and your family) have become. Just leave them all behind so he can have someone else to boss around or deceive and eventually lay the blame upon.
Did it ever occur to this author that sometimes the people speaking up against the king are a Nathan? The very fact that this tale of three kings skips completely over those chapters tells me volumes about what the author was thinking when he wrote this book and what pastors are thinking when they hand it out to their unsuspecting congregations. Did it ever occur to this author that those who speak up against the “anointed” are Elijahs, or Daniels, or Martin Luthers? But no, the only option included in this tale is that of Absalom. The author insists that there is no way of knowing the difference between a corrupt leader and a misguided one. Then he suggests that the only option for one who rises to oppose that leader is one of sinful rebellion. The message intended here is obviously “resistance is futile”, and though it promises a study of brokenness, it does nothing to help those who are hopelessly broken other than to suggest that they not speak up in any way against those who broke them. Those who, like me, have tried for years to speak up and be heard, are only discouraged more by this author’s words.
This book clearly shows an author hiding behind the shield of legalism. And here we see how legalism hurts. The law being implied here is “thou shalt not question the Lord’s anointed”, as if the anointing was—and still is—a carte blanche for “David” to do all the things he did wrong in his reign. Saul’s anointing, it is implied, was by another set of rules where, as soon as he messed up once, was revoked. But not David’s. Nope, David’s anointing was irrevocable. And so, by David’s unquestionably-anointed bloodline, the kingdom of Israel was divided, scattered, and even (some suspect) portions of the Bible were edited to remove any and all other contenders for that anointing.
The author identifies this anointing as something to HAVE: a kingdom or a congregation. But what about those who feel God’s anointing on them is something to DO: To write a book or a song or to train up a child or to start a ministry in their community that is badly needed? I suppose David might have viewed his anointing as a task to do if it was not so much the ownership of a kingdom as it was the responsibility of a shepherd. His offspring, who told his story, certainly did not. Then again, pastors might fare better looking at their church not as a kingdom to own, but a flock to teach and guide—and not just to guide into following his law and order, either. If only we could find one of them to write a book on this subject. But there I go again, being Absalom.
This book is a perfect example of what I was trying to say when I wrote the Sarian’s Sword. Like a sword, the Bible is only as good—or as evil—as the one who uses it. Here we see a pastor throwing his spear of twisted scripture at all who question him. And here we see how those who question that pastor must get real good at defending themselves against those spears (using their own spear of scripture, which the author discourages). In my own experience, I did just what David did. I got real good at dodging. Then one day I turned around and found that those spears that missed me had hit my family, my friends, and my loved ones. What are you supposed to do then? Are you supposed to just tell them to “take it”? Are you supposed to just tell them to leave quietly and not to question the “Lord’s Anointed”? That’s what I did. Now my kids don’t want anything to do with church. Now I sit on the sidelines listening to stories of the other kids from the church getting pregnant, arrested, tattooed, and even dying under the leadership of the “Lord’s Anointed”. But now, after reading this book, I have decided to say something.
When it comes to warping the minds of the young and destroying the next generation, patience and apathy are no longer options I can consider. This is not the time for meekness or martyrdom. This is not the time for silence or ignorance as to the true meaning of scripture. And if I am just another Absalom, I’ll see this Saul of an author in HELL!
I have read a long list of books dealing with disagreements, disillusion, and splits in churches. It seems that these things happen quite regularly; otherwise there wouldn’t be any market to entice publishers to print so many of these books. Unfortunately, most of them are written by pastors who are obviously writing from the side of the person demanding authority over his disenchanted followers. Is this one of those books? Maybe it is. Maybe it isn’t. I could say, like the writer, that only God knows.
No. I’m just going to come out and say it. The evil of this book is its appeal. It is appealing to broken people. It appeals to the people who feel like Joseph in Pharaoh’s dungeon—waiting and hoping that God will vindicate them, will make good of all the injustices—but just rotting away in the meantime. We pick up this book wanting to know why all the bad things happened in our lives. Why people had to die. Why our dreams had to fail. Why every time we try to do the right thing we get the crap kicked out of us… and then we have to suffer the injustice of watching the guy who “broke” us succeed at his own vile agenda. The author describes our wounds so well, we feel as though he is speaking directly to us. Then he tells us that we are wrong to feel wounded. He tells us that we should not take action against our transgressors—not even speak up to point out their transgressions. In fact, he tells us we should hang in there and let ourselves be abused by the tyrannical pastor (never once pointing out that he might be one such pastor) until we are so broken and worn out that we just can’t take any more. And then, to ensure that we do not deprive our oppressor of his other victims, the author tells us we need to leave…alone. As in don’t try to liberate anybody else from the oppressor. Don’t try to bring the brute to justice. Don’t try to keep anybody else from being as hurt as you (and your family) have become. Just leave them all behind so he can have someone else to boss around or deceive and eventually lay the blame upon.
Did it ever occur to this author that sometimes the people speaking up against the king are a Nathan? The very fact that this tale of three kings skips completely over those chapters tells me volumes about what the author was thinking when he wrote this book and what pastors are thinking when they hand it out to their unsuspecting congregations. Did it ever occur to this author that those who speak up against the “anointed” are Elijahs, or Daniels, or Martin Luthers? But no, the only option included in this tale is that of Absalom. The author insists that there is no way of knowing the difference between a corrupt leader and a misguided one. Then he suggests that the only option for one who rises to oppose that leader is one of sinful rebellion. The message intended here is obviously “resistance is futile”, and though it promises a study of brokenness, it does nothing to help those who are hopelessly broken other than to suggest that they not speak up in any way against those who broke them. Those who, like me, have tried for years to speak up and be heard, are only discouraged more by this author’s words.
This book clearly shows an author hiding behind the shield of legalism. And here we see how legalism hurts. The law being implied here is “thou shalt not question the Lord’s anointed”, as if the anointing was—and still is—a carte blanche for “David” to do all the things he did wrong in his reign. Saul’s anointing, it is implied, was by another set of rules where, as soon as he messed up once, was revoked. But not David’s. Nope, David’s anointing was irrevocable. And so, by David’s unquestionably-anointed bloodline, the kingdom of Israel was divided, scattered, and even (some suspect) portions of the Bible were edited to remove any and all other contenders for that anointing.
The author identifies this anointing as something to HAVE: a kingdom or a congregation. But what about those who feel God’s anointing on them is something to DO: To write a book or a song or to train up a child or to start a ministry in their community that is badly needed? I suppose David might have viewed his anointing as a task to do if it was not so much the ownership of a kingdom as it was the responsibility of a shepherd. His offspring, who told his story, certainly did not. Then again, pastors might fare better looking at their church not as a kingdom to own, but a flock to teach and guide—and not just to guide into following his law and order, either. If only we could find one of them to write a book on this subject. But there I go again, being Absalom.
This book is a perfect example of what I was trying to say when I wrote the Sarian’s Sword. Like a sword, the Bible is only as good—or as evil—as the one who uses it. Here we see a pastor throwing his spear of twisted scripture at all who question him. And here we see how those who question that pastor must get real good at defending themselves against those spears (using their own spear of scripture, which the author discourages). In my own experience, I did just what David did. I got real good at dodging. Then one day I turned around and found that those spears that missed me had hit my family, my friends, and my loved ones. What are you supposed to do then? Are you supposed to just tell them to “take it”? Are you supposed to just tell them to leave quietly and not to question the “Lord’s Anointed”? That’s what I did. Now my kids don’t want anything to do with church. Now I sit on the sidelines listening to stories of the other kids from the church getting pregnant, arrested, tattooed, and even dying under the leadership of the “Lord’s Anointed”. But now, after reading this book, I have decided to say something.
When it comes to warping the minds of the young and destroying the next generation, patience and apathy are no longer options I can consider. This is not the time for meekness or martyrdom. This is not the time for silence or ignorance as to the true meaning of scripture. And if I am just another Absalom, I’ll see this Saul of an author in HELL!
October 10, 2008
I found this book in our Calvary bookstore a couple years ago and never started it, thinking it was an Old Testament study of the kings. Instead, it is a wonderfully written story (in play form in Two Acts) with King Saul, King David and Absalom. It was a call to remembrance of Who is in control and how to handle ourselves when the Christian life gets us down. Hurting Christians should read this book, especially if you've been hurt by others within your fellowship. We all should have the heart of David. I love this line from the end of the book. "The throne is not mine. Not to have, not to take, not to protect, and not to keep."
October 9, 2007
OUCH! OK - you're hurting and confused about poor leadership. So you go read a book about three kings: Saul, David, and Absolom. It is like a play unfolding before you as you turn the pages. Ah, there is Saul... now that is the bad leader who is attacking me! Ah, and there is David... that must be me! And then comes Absolom, but who is this? The mirror rises and you see your own face. ME? Not ME! The jury is still out, but don't be convinced yet if you are Saul, David, or Absolom... but time may tell. OUCH!
March 25, 2012
When I was a very young pastor in California, my uncle (also a pastor) met me on the highway just north of Fort Worth, Texas to give me a book I just had to read.
My wife and I had been home to Texas for a visit and when we returned to California, a huge challenge faced us. There was a battle brewing, a power struggle in our young church.
My wife started reading it aloud to me as we made the 1600-mile trek back to north central California. Once she started, she could not stop. By the time we were home, she had read it in its entirety. We both wept a good deal.
This book, written in such simple language, was a life-changer, a game-changer, for me. It helped establish my philosophy of ministry and dealing with self-promoters and power-hungry people. It illustrated and reinforced the true meaning and the power of humility. Because of the importance of when it came into my hands, it remains one of the most important books I have ever read.
My wife and I had been home to Texas for a visit and when we returned to California, a huge challenge faced us. There was a battle brewing, a power struggle in our young church.
My wife started reading it aloud to me as we made the 1600-mile trek back to north central California. Once she started, she could not stop. By the time we were home, she had read it in its entirety. We both wept a good deal.
This book, written in such simple language, was a life-changer, a game-changer, for me. It helped establish my philosophy of ministry and dealing with self-promoters and power-hungry people. It illustrated and reinforced the true meaning and the power of humility. Because of the importance of when it came into my hands, it remains one of the most important books I have ever read.
May 5, 2018
TALE OF THREE KINGS was the very first "exit" book I read when leaving Fundamentalism. In many ways, especially to a Fundamentalist, it is a very validating book. It does assure you that yes, the preacher who is abusing others (or you) really is doing evil. On the other hand, Edwards does not go far enough (in fact, he makes no real move) in the direction of showing that wicked men in church authority are to be removed from office according to the Scripture. He tells the suffering person to submit, submit, submit. Edwards is strong on analysis, strong on sympathizing with the suffering, but weak on guidance. The New Testament does provide a procedure for removing bad elders. Sadly, in today's celebrity-driven religious right, the Evangelicals and Fundamentalists have removed those teachings from their church constitutions and by-laws.
Edwards really endorses "brokenness" as a Christian virtue. Back when I also endorsed this idea that God had to "break" me to use me, I liked his book a whole lot. Now that I recognize that "brokenness" is never identified in Scripture as a virtue or a goal of our Sanctification in Christ, I am less enthusiastic about the book. But it does make so me very good points.
Edwards really endorses "brokenness" as a Christian virtue. Back when I also endorsed this idea that God had to "break" me to use me, I liked his book a whole lot. Now that I recognize that "brokenness" is never identified in Scripture as a virtue or a goal of our Sanctification in Christ, I am less enthusiastic about the book. But it does make so me very good points.
July 13, 2021
Leí este libro por recomendación de mi hermano, un pastor que ama las congregaciones donde ha pastoreado. Lo leí porque estamos recibiendo en nuestra iglesia personas de otras iglesias. Muchas de ellas heridas, defraudadas, traicionadas o, al menos, lastimadas.
Pero el libro me habló profundamente. La reflexión es sabia y sencilla. Relata lo que “sucedió” tras bambalinas en las historias de Saúl y David, y David y Absalón. Este pequeño libro no tiene pérdida para cualquier creyente que desee saber más de fe, liderazgo y sumisión a Dios.
Pero el libro me habló profundamente. La reflexión es sabia y sencilla. Relata lo que “sucedió” tras bambalinas en las historias de Saúl y David, y David y Absalón. Este pequeño libro no tiene pérdida para cualquier creyente que desee saber más de fe, liderazgo y sumisión a Dios.
June 11, 2023
This book had my number right out the gate. Pressed me all game, barely got off the line. Forced me to go watch film and get better. Would recommend.
September 22, 2012
I like Edwards' simplicity in writing, it's especially nice after reading more difficult writing styles.
But, I felt like Gene was, in places, arguing that the truth needs not to be defended (if you don't like the word "defended," because of negative associations, then use the word "upheld" or "preached" or "exhorted" or etc.). That laymen or elders or preachers don't need to watch the flock, to keep the sheep free from lies, free from wolves, free even from misguided sheep. That instead of being gentle in rebuke, that, in fact, it's better to do nothing.
Just do nothing.
But, again, I don't think this is biblical. I would point to the pastoral letters, also to Paul's rebuke of Peter, also to Nathan's rebuke of David, and etc. Granted, the less training or less learned we are in the Bible, the more we should be quick to listen and be gentle. But there comes a time when truth needs to be upheld, where wolves, or misguided sheep need to be rebuked, sometimes banned from fellowship because of their denials of truths Jesus preached, that God has spoken in His word. (This is where we need to be clear about essentials, non-essentials, the importance of different truths).
Why?
Because sheep are sons and daughters of God. But how will they draw nearer to God if they don't know His truths? How will they remain comforted by the Spirit of Truth if they are led away from the Truth?
So saying all that, we need to be REALLY, REALLY, REALLY humble when it comes to these things. It doesn't mean we have to be limp-wristed cowards. It does mean we need to draw close to God, and with all that we are cry out to Him, knowing that these things are not trivial. We deal with both God's word and the souls of mankind. Eternity is in the window, this isn't court tv. And we deal with God, our Creator, our Lord, the Judge of all, are we gonna be arrogant and quick to throw brothers and sisters into hell over small truths or ignorance? NO!
Nevertheless, we need to come to the Spirit to gain wisdom, love, humility, strength, and (even though the word is soooo abused) discernment. Are we certain of the truths we are "defending?" Are we certain there isn't just a misunderstanding? Are our motives basically good? Are we doing this, in love, because we love God and love His people?
Or are we doing this from a feeling that only we can guard God's truth, and only we have it, and only we have wisdom, and etc.?
So before we ever defend truth, let us come to God as broken vessels in prayer and seek Him in His word, ask for counsel from better and wiser Christians, and then pray some more, and then to trust in God's leading hand, walk with Him, trust in His promises, and act in gentleness, love, truth.
Always, always, always, begin in gentleness.
But please, don't ever just do nothing. At least pray and read the word and seek counsel.
But, I felt like Gene was, in places, arguing that the truth needs not to be defended (if you don't like the word "defended," because of negative associations, then use the word "upheld" or "preached" or "exhorted" or etc.). That laymen or elders or preachers don't need to watch the flock, to keep the sheep free from lies, free from wolves, free even from misguided sheep. That instead of being gentle in rebuke, that, in fact, it's better to do nothing.
Just do nothing.
But, again, I don't think this is biblical. I would point to the pastoral letters, also to Paul's rebuke of Peter, also to Nathan's rebuke of David, and etc. Granted, the less training or less learned we are in the Bible, the more we should be quick to listen and be gentle. But there comes a time when truth needs to be upheld, where wolves, or misguided sheep need to be rebuked, sometimes banned from fellowship because of their denials of truths Jesus preached, that God has spoken in His word. (This is where we need to be clear about essentials, non-essentials, the importance of different truths).
Why?
Because sheep are sons and daughters of God. But how will they draw nearer to God if they don't know His truths? How will they remain comforted by the Spirit of Truth if they are led away from the Truth?
So saying all that, we need to be REALLY, REALLY, REALLY humble when it comes to these things. It doesn't mean we have to be limp-wristed cowards. It does mean we need to draw close to God, and with all that we are cry out to Him, knowing that these things are not trivial. We deal with both God's word and the souls of mankind. Eternity is in the window, this isn't court tv. And we deal with God, our Creator, our Lord, the Judge of all, are we gonna be arrogant and quick to throw brothers and sisters into hell over small truths or ignorance? NO!
Nevertheless, we need to come to the Spirit to gain wisdom, love, humility, strength, and (even though the word is soooo abused) discernment. Are we certain of the truths we are "defending?" Are we certain there isn't just a misunderstanding? Are our motives basically good? Are we doing this, in love, because we love God and love His people?
Or are we doing this from a feeling that only we can guard God's truth, and only we have it, and only we have wisdom, and etc.?
So before we ever defend truth, let us come to God as broken vessels in prayer and seek Him in His word, ask for counsel from better and wiser Christians, and then pray some more, and then to trust in God's leading hand, walk with Him, trust in His promises, and act in gentleness, love, truth.
Always, always, always, begin in gentleness.
But please, don't ever just do nothing. At least pray and read the word and seek counsel.
January 2, 2014
I read this book a long time ago and liked the fairy tale format that the writing takes. I remember enjoying it.
But this time, I didn't like the content at all.
The book is based on the biblical stories of kings Saul, David, and Absalom. It made good points about how you don't really know people's hearts. In the Bible, King Saul goes crazy and throws spears at David. David tries to reconcile with his king until eventually he has to run for his life. Even then David continues to treat Saul with kindness. Edwards takes this story to mean that people should not question or fight against spiritual leaders. Even if your leader is bad, he reasons, God is using him/her to make your heart broken and humble.
I am very, very concerned about what this book is saying about abusive relationships. It seems to me that Edwards is saying that godly people just take the abuse. That is a dangerous thing to say about any relationship. God does not want people to be abused. If you are in any kind of abusive relationship, you should run away and get to a place that is safe.
The church needs to stop shaming and quieting people.
But this time, I didn't like the content at all.
The book is based on the biblical stories of kings Saul, David, and Absalom. It made good points about how you don't really know people's hearts. In the Bible, King Saul goes crazy and throws spears at David. David tries to reconcile with his king until eventually he has to run for his life. Even then David continues to treat Saul with kindness. Edwards takes this story to mean that people should not question or fight against spiritual leaders. Even if your leader is bad, he reasons, God is using him/her to make your heart broken and humble.
I am very, very concerned about what this book is saying about abusive relationships. It seems to me that Edwards is saying that godly people just take the abuse. That is a dangerous thing to say about any relationship. God does not want people to be abused. If you are in any kind of abusive relationship, you should run away and get to a place that is safe.
The church needs to stop shaming and quieting people.
February 2, 2020
This book has followed me through my twenties always reminding me of the Saul that is within my heart, the Absalom that is found within my dreams, and the David found -I hope- within God’s work in me.
So where is a true “kingdom” leader? You might look to the nearest cave. The one with tear stains on their cheeks and a broken heart bleeding through their chest.
Thankful for the healing balm that is this work.
So where is a true “kingdom” leader? You might look to the nearest cave. The one with tear stains on their cheeks and a broken heart bleeding through their chest.
Thankful for the healing balm that is this work.
May 19, 2020
God has a university. It’s a small school. Few enrol; even fewer graduate. Very, very few indeed. God has this school because he does not have broken men and women. Instead, he has several other types of people. He has people who claim to have God’s authority... and don’t – people who claim to be broken... and aren’t. And people who do have God’s authority, but who are (mad and) unbroken.
In God’s sacred school of submission and brokenness, why are there so few students? Because all students in this school must suffer much pain. (Excerpt from book)
A Tale Of Three Kings by Gene Edwards is considered a modern classic of Christian literature. It was published in 1980 yet still often appears on the list of the top 100 sellers of Christian books. It has become assigned reading in Bible schools and seminaries worldwide, and has been translated into thirty languages. Funny thing is that I never knew this book existed until a wise mentor friend of mine encouraged me to read it recently. I'm so glad he did.
A Tale Of Three Kings does not fall easily into any genre. It is a study in brokenness, but is written as a first person narrative delving into King David's struggle with Saul and Absalom (and the reader's comparison to each of the three kings). It contains many fictional conversations by David so I guess the closest genres would be historical fiction/classic.
Perhaps it was just a very timely read, or where I currently am in my Spiritual walk, but I can say that this book ministered to me on a level no other fictional book has thus far. I cannot recommend this book more highly to any person in ministry leadership, especially those who have at times struggled with the authority God has placed them under. To the casual Christian however, this book may not have the same impact, nor the relevance, nor the revelation... then again, it just might.
In God’s sacred school of submission and brokenness, why are there so few students? Because all students in this school must suffer much pain. (Excerpt from book)
A Tale Of Three Kings by Gene Edwards is considered a modern classic of Christian literature. It was published in 1980 yet still often appears on the list of the top 100 sellers of Christian books. It has become assigned reading in Bible schools and seminaries worldwide, and has been translated into thirty languages. Funny thing is that I never knew this book existed until a wise mentor friend of mine encouraged me to read it recently. I'm so glad he did.
A Tale Of Three Kings does not fall easily into any genre. It is a study in brokenness, but is written as a first person narrative delving into King David's struggle with Saul and Absalom (and the reader's comparison to each of the three kings). It contains many fictional conversations by David so I guess the closest genres would be historical fiction/classic.
Perhaps it was just a very timely read, or where I currently am in my Spiritual walk, but I can say that this book ministered to me on a level no other fictional book has thus far. I cannot recommend this book more highly to any person in ministry leadership, especially those who have at times struggled with the authority God has placed them under. To the casual Christian however, this book may not have the same impact, nor the relevance, nor the revelation... then again, it just might.
July 3, 2021
This has been on my list for a long time. I've heard so much about it - mainly through book reviews and such. So I finally picked it up and read it in one setting. It's a super quick read.
But I have to confess, it made me uneasy. I agree with some of the principles, but to do what the author promotes requires discernment, otherwise I believe this book can be dangerous.
What is Edwards promoting? Submission. Carte Blanche submission to leadership - to any kind of leadership.
He uses the stories of Saul, David, and Absalom (The Three Kings) to creatively illustrate his point. David submitted to Saul's leadership, and even submitted to Absalom's rebellion. Therefore, suggests Edwards, we are to submit to whatever earthly leadership we find ourselves under.
That's a bit creepy. I understand (and even appreciate) the main principle, which I take to be trust God. Trust that God will be your deliverer. God will see about you so you don't need to spend your time fending for or defending yourself. David didn't and the Lord saw to him. But, to unflinchingly lay down for any man, tyrant though he may be, is not the point of these narratives, as Edwards seems to suggest.
I'm sure the author didn't intended for this, but, if not careful, books like this could allow the vulnerable to remain in toxic cultures of spiritual abuse.
But I have to confess, it made me uneasy. I agree with some of the principles, but to do what the author promotes requires discernment, otherwise I believe this book can be dangerous.
What is Edwards promoting? Submission. Carte Blanche submission to leadership - to any kind of leadership.
He uses the stories of Saul, David, and Absalom (The Three Kings) to creatively illustrate his point. David submitted to Saul's leadership, and even submitted to Absalom's rebellion. Therefore, suggests Edwards, we are to submit to whatever earthly leadership we find ourselves under.
That's a bit creepy. I understand (and even appreciate) the main principle, which I take to be trust God. Trust that God will be your deliverer. God will see about you so you don't need to spend your time fending for or defending yourself. David didn't and the Lord saw to him. But, to unflinchingly lay down for any man, tyrant though he may be, is not the point of these narratives, as Edwards seems to suggest.
I'm sure the author didn't intended for this, but, if not careful, books like this could allow the vulnerable to remain in toxic cultures of spiritual abuse.
January 14, 2021
I have read "A Tale of Three King" by Gene Edwards so many times!! The story continues to fascinate me! This last time, I read the entire book in one day! The text delights me, challenges me and offers amazing revelation into the true value of strength and brokenness and vulnerability. I am a big fan of Gene Edwards but there is something about THIS book that truly sets him apart. Part One talks about David's relationship with King Saul and the inward destruction of King Saul and what David did - not throwing back spears, did not retaliate back, used his purpose for good - is what would catapult him into the next phase of leadership. Part Two is about David's plight and what he does in the caves and under extreme isolation which speaks volumes about his character and integrity. And Part Three is about King David and the attack from Absalom which showcases how humily, submission and a spirit of brokenness is more honorable than any crown. Truly exemplary! A must read!! It showed me that I need to have a broken and humble spirit, to not throw back spears to my haters, and to keep resiliant in the faith!
This entire review has been hidden because of spoilers.
April 13, 2021
This is a really unique book that offers lessons on suffering, leadership, and authority through the retelling of the relationship between Saul, David, and Absalom. It’s an enjoyable, beneficial, and very short read.
August 8, 2025
A thought-provoking, textured, and emotional dramatization of the familiar story of King David. While exploring with much inference, Gene Edward’s whimsical tone drives home uncomfortable truths and wrestles with themes of authority, submission, obedience, brokeness, and trust. At times, it feels Edward paints with a broad brush, asserting a lot of prescriptive conclusions from arguably descriptive Biblical narrative. He has a point to make and there’s moments one wonders if he bends the story to frame his own personal beliefs. A story worth your time for the truths it powerfully presents and themes it forces one to ponder.
February 8, 2025
“There are always problems in any kingdom. Always. Furthermore , the ability to be able to see those problems is a cheap gift, indeed.”
March 8, 2012
NOT RECOMMENDED
I found this to be a very confusing book from a Christian perspective. Although it is a nice story (the author actually says it is more like a Ballard), I think it can be dangerous to young Christians or those with shallow theological roots.
My main concern is that it is a story told from the parts of the Bible that are silent, as if the author was a bystander watching the events the Bible describes go on, and then filling in the gaps with his own thoughts, however he mixes Biblical truth and quotes scripture amongst his conjecture, and it is hard to tell where the truth ends and the fantasy begins. There are some nuggets of wisdom, but are they Spiritually discerned or just human wisdom? I think it is easier to read the Bible directly.
Also, I did not notice any mention of Jesus in this book, I might have missed it because I was not looking for this all the way through, it was just something that came to me at the end of the book. Now, if you remove "Christ" you cannot have some thing that is "Christ"-ian.
Perhaps it is a good Jewish story full of Jewish wisdom, but then this would be a teaching of the Law.
And there are some good moral teachings, but apart from Christ being our perfect moral standard and that standard imputed to us, our attempts to live moral lives on our own efforts is an affront to God, and does not bring Glory to Him through His Son.
You might think this is a bit harsh, as the book claims to be just a story. Consider the damage another "story", The Da vinci Code, caused.
I found this to be a very confusing book from a Christian perspective. Although it is a nice story (the author actually says it is more like a Ballard), I think it can be dangerous to young Christians or those with shallow theological roots.
My main concern is that it is a story told from the parts of the Bible that are silent, as if the author was a bystander watching the events the Bible describes go on, and then filling in the gaps with his own thoughts, however he mixes Biblical truth and quotes scripture amongst his conjecture, and it is hard to tell where the truth ends and the fantasy begins. There are some nuggets of wisdom, but are they Spiritually discerned or just human wisdom? I think it is easier to read the Bible directly.
Also, I did not notice any mention of Jesus in this book, I might have missed it because I was not looking for this all the way through, it was just something that came to me at the end of the book. Now, if you remove "Christ" you cannot have some thing that is "Christ"-ian.
Perhaps it is a good Jewish story full of Jewish wisdom, but then this would be a teaching of the Law.
And there are some good moral teachings, but apart from Christ being our perfect moral standard and that standard imputed to us, our attempts to live moral lives on our own efforts is an affront to God, and does not bring Glory to Him through His Son.
You might think this is a bit harsh, as the book claims to be just a story. Consider the damage another "story", The Da vinci Code, caused.
March 19, 2025
Little sucker packs a punch. Read in less than two hours, but I’m sure the 3 kings will stick with me for a long time.
Would recommend this to anyone who has been hurt by the church / spiritual leadership / authoritarian evangelical leaders (with the MAJOR exception of any type of sexual abuse. I don’t think this book would be helpful for this type of hurt/abuse, since it seems to advocate for keeping quiet in the face of hurt). This book causes the reader to self-reflect in major ways & explains why God may choose “bad” leaders to accomplish his tasks.
Would recommend this to anyone who has been hurt by the church / spiritual leadership / authoritarian evangelical leaders (with the MAJOR exception of any type of sexual abuse. I don’t think this book would be helpful for this type of hurt/abuse, since it seems to advocate for keeping quiet in the face of hurt). This book causes the reader to self-reflect in major ways & explains why God may choose “bad” leaders to accomplish his tasks.
October 17, 2022
Edwards classic on authority in God's kingdom is a poetic representation of David at the beginning and end of his illustrious reign. It delves into the issue of detachment from the thirst of power that cripples humble service for God.
This book is short but written in a way that provokes several pauses to contemplate what is being communicated. It is in narrative form with David and several different interlocutors. The author does take some creative liberties in creating various dialogues but close scrutiny will show that they are faithful to the biblical reporting on David under Saul's reign and during Absalom's rebellion.
There are multiple uses for this book. It has a distinct devotional quality that would enrich your meditation times. Small groups studies centered on the book would be very profitable. Then there is the explicit need for all those in spiritual leadership to contemplate this book's message as a challenge to our inner motives for kingdom service.
This book is short but written in a way that provokes several pauses to contemplate what is being communicated. It is in narrative form with David and several different interlocutors. The author does take some creative liberties in creating various dialogues but close scrutiny will show that they are faithful to the biblical reporting on David under Saul's reign and during Absalom's rebellion.
There are multiple uses for this book. It has a distinct devotional quality that would enrich your meditation times. Small groups studies centered on the book would be very profitable. Then there is the explicit need for all those in spiritual leadership to contemplate this book's message as a challenge to our inner motives for kingdom service.
August 7, 2025
A unique approach to the story of Saul, David, and Absalom with the aim of communicating what God-honoring spiritual authority and submission look like. The book has a dramatic and poetic rhythm to it. Short chapters, repeated themes and language, and regular breaking of the fourth wall all tied to a loose biblical narrative sprinkled with creative liberties.
Things I liked:
-Some of the biblical scenes he brought to life vividly in a way that seemed very real and relatable.
-the point that God uses “Sauls and absaloms” in the world to kill and break the “Saul’s and absaloms” in our on hearts. That’s solid, found that true in my own life.
-Gods power is best stewarded in broken vessels.
-it is not our place to judge who the Lords anointed are and who they are not. Nor is it our place to speak ill or judge, but rather to trust the Lord and be faithful where we are.
Things I struggled with:
-the poetic and symbolic language sometimes oversimplified things that are not simple.
-the creative license was used to steer the narrative towards reinforcing the points the author was trying to make. It fleshed out thoughts, feelings, and motives of biblical characters that were pure conjecture.
-The idea that there are no spiritual rebels that god approves of. Umm Luther? Bonhoeffer? The Anabaptists? Jesus?!?!
-The praised response of David in this book in response to the abusive authority of Saul and Absalom is that David did nothing, he didn’t have a closed fist around the authority and position God gave him, but rather trusted God with a humble heart. I get that. With that said, the way it is written almost seems like an abdication of responsibility. Sometimes God does call Godly men to stand up to evil ones. And u don’t think it’s accurate to say David did nothing, he maneuvered away from the abuse, stayed respectful and trusted God, but stayed busy acting, leading, and fighting where he had opportunity.
Things I liked:
-Some of the biblical scenes he brought to life vividly in a way that seemed very real and relatable.
-the point that God uses “Sauls and absaloms” in the world to kill and break the “Saul’s and absaloms” in our on hearts. That’s solid, found that true in my own life.
-Gods power is best stewarded in broken vessels.
-it is not our place to judge who the Lords anointed are and who they are not. Nor is it our place to speak ill or judge, but rather to trust the Lord and be faithful where we are.
Things I struggled with:
-the poetic and symbolic language sometimes oversimplified things that are not simple.
-the creative license was used to steer the narrative towards reinforcing the points the author was trying to make. It fleshed out thoughts, feelings, and motives of biblical characters that were pure conjecture.
-The idea that there are no spiritual rebels that god approves of. Umm Luther? Bonhoeffer? The Anabaptists? Jesus?!?!
-The praised response of David in this book in response to the abusive authority of Saul and Absalom is that David did nothing, he didn’t have a closed fist around the authority and position God gave him, but rather trusted God with a humble heart. I get that. With that said, the way it is written almost seems like an abdication of responsibility. Sometimes God does call Godly men to stand up to evil ones. And u don’t think it’s accurate to say David did nothing, he maneuvered away from the abuse, stayed respectful and trusted God, but stayed busy acting, leading, and fighting where he had opportunity.
July 4, 2025
A very challenging call to Godly leadership and our response to ungodly leaders. I appreciate how Gene Edwards focuses on David and his responses to both Saul and Absalom. Instead of instructing leaders to not throw spears, Edwards takes it a step further to instruct people to dodge them and not throw them back. Many authors want to hound leaders, especially spiritual leaders, to be confrontational and unyielding, to accept their God-given position of authority and not let go. Edwards present a better vision, to hold leadership open handedly, not crushing rebellion or forcing your way into leadership. It results in people respecting their leaders, but it’s rooted in an embrace of brokenness, not authority. Further his story telling is impeccable. Edwards uses a familiar story to illuminate his Biblically-rooted leadership philosophy. It feels like watching a stage-play when reading this book and his chapters are short and to the point. There is not a single line of dialogue that does not both engage and instruct the readers. I recommend to everyone, especially people who are navigating service under bold personalities and leadership styles.
November 25, 2023
"What do you do when someone throws a spear at you?"
A quick read with many compelling thoughts that provide a few answers into the madness and beauty of brokenness.
A quick read with many compelling thoughts that provide a few answers into the madness and beauty of brokenness.
November 6, 2011
A great book about what to do in the midst of trials that seem unfair and obscure. Especially, as we wonder who is "of God" and who is not. God does not reveal who is anointed and we may never know. What we do have is the choice to respond well. This much, the book made clear. I have definitely faced Saul's and Absolom's. I can only hope to approach the courage of David and the where with all to stand what the way he did. This is a great read and will draw you into the storyline. I highly recommend it for leadership and character development.
January 16, 2022
I really wanted to like this book but I don’t understand why it is so highly recommended. The concepts are good but the writing is stuck between an odd mix of poetry and prose. I found myself cringing the whole time. I also don’t think it should be labeled a study in brokenness when that isn’t necessarily the focus of the book. A study in leadership or authority maybe? Though brokenness was a theme, it wasn’t the central focus of the book.
I can see where it would be useful in certain seasons of life. Perhaps I’ll need it in another season.
I can see where it would be useful in certain seasons of life. Perhaps I’ll need it in another season.
January 22, 2025
Shout out Alex for the recommendation. This book was excellent and insightful. I think I will be turning back to this one many times in the future.
(First) Reread is here! Such a beautifully written book and strong reminder that God loves the cave! I am of all three kings
(First) Reread is here! Such a beautifully written book and strong reminder that God loves the cave! I am of all three kings
January 10, 2023
More of a thought-provoking short story than a book, this piece presents the fictional imagining of parts of the Old Testament biblical account of different stages of King David's life. And it does so in a manner very reminiscent of a fable.
As a piece of literature, it's well-written and interestingly stylized. As many times as I've read the book of 1 Samuel, I had never before considered how very difficult David's pre-kingship life must have been--or how much unfairness tested him once he was anointed. (For some reason I'd been seeing his life as a series of adventures, when in fact it was filled with sorrows and betrayal--most of which being a result of king Saul's corruption and jealousy.) Edwards really brought forth some vivid emotional considerations, for which I am grateful.
I'd prefer to imagine the overall "lesson" of this work as a caution directed at twisted Saul-like leaders... and perhaps all discord-sowing malcontents who have the habit of grabbing at power, with no thought to seeking and prioritizing God's actual will for their life (or the lives of their hapless followers and/or victims.) But in all honesty, they're probably not looking for anything that might offer introspection. And having worked with several ex-cult members... I could definitely see how a work like this could potentially be utilized--by the deceived, delusional, or just plain evil--as a means of maintaining control.
All that being said, I very much doubt the author's intent was to provide a resource for the abusive or unscrupulous. And it pains me how many reviewers seem eager to throw the baby out with the bathwater.
Were this being utilized as some sort of prescriptive sermon, then yes, I would see cause for concern. While there is great value in the principle of respecting someone in authority, even when they don't deserve it--not striving to be the one to remove them, and instead waiting on God's timing and justice--there are times Edwards seems to be promoting blanket passivity. (Perhaps he's viewing the account through the eyes of a pacifist. I don't know, but that would not surprise me.)
As a piece of literature, it's well-written and interestingly stylized. As many times as I've read the book of 1 Samuel, I had never before considered how very difficult David's pre-kingship life must have been--or how much unfairness tested him once he was anointed. (For some reason I'd been seeing his life as a series of adventures, when in fact it was filled with sorrows and betrayal--most of which being a result of king Saul's corruption and jealousy.) Edwards really brought forth some vivid emotional considerations, for which I am grateful.
I'd prefer to imagine the overall "lesson" of this work as a caution directed at twisted Saul-like leaders... and perhaps all discord-sowing malcontents who have the habit of grabbing at power, with no thought to seeking and prioritizing God's actual will for their life (or the lives of their hapless followers and/or victims.) But in all honesty, they're probably not looking for anything that might offer introspection. And having worked with several ex-cult members... I could definitely see how a work like this could potentially be utilized--by the deceived, delusional, or just plain evil--as a means of maintaining control.
All that being said, I very much doubt the author's intent was to provide a resource for the abusive or unscrupulous. And it pains me how many reviewers seem eager to throw the baby out with the bathwater.
Were this being utilized as some sort of prescriptive sermon, then yes, I would see cause for concern. While there is great value in the principle of respecting someone in authority, even when they don't deserve it--not striving to be the one to remove them, and instead waiting on God's timing and justice--there are times Edwards seems to be promoting blanket passivity. (Perhaps he's viewing the account through the eyes of a pacifist. I don't know, but that would not surprise me.)
February 4, 2025
The first time I read this book I enjoyed it, the 2nd time not as much as I did the first time..and here's why:
1. I thought this was a simple creative/pleasure read but it's supposed to offer hope to those who have been broken/mistreated; in that regard, the book only does so much.
Gene encourages with the "do nothing" model in that he breaks down how God uses our haters to kill the "Saul" in us. I think that aspect of this book is encouraging for sure.
But the whole "if you do anything....you'll become a Saul" isn't encouraging, and if anything empowers the abusers to continue to abuse.
Sure, in David's situation doing nothing worked against Saul. But, Moses stood up to Pharoh, Nathan...ironically to David, and Elisah and Jehu to King Ahab and Jezebel. So to prescribe a "do nothing" approach to every situation is dangerous. The NT acknowledges this and provides an option to remove sinful Elders in 1 Timothy 5:19-20.
2. The whole "there is no list to measure whether one is anointed and approved by God" also aids in the continuation of abuse. The NT provides various lists that can aid a congregation. The fruit of the Spirit, the qualifications of a Bishop, the qualifications of an Elder, and a list of sinful behaviors.
3. I didn't realize how repetitive the book was the first time around, but it is. Gene Edwards continues to push this "if I do this, I'm a Saul" and "if I do nothing, I'm a David" phrase through multiple characters in the book. I think diving into what made Saul Saul, beyond the spear throwing and David chasing, would have been a more interesting thought experiment.
Pros:
1. the whole "there's a Saul in every one of us" was creative and so true. Every single one of us are sinful beings capable of doing things we can't even imagine. I love how this idea was portrayed in the book.
2. The author does a great job of breaking down Absolum and his application. The section about how rebels always take from the kingdom they left was a very helpful and practical warning. I like how he mentioned the difficulties of leadership as well, and how it's easy to say "I could do better if I was in power".
3. I love the prologue of the book, it was very well done and very creative.
1. I thought this was a simple creative/pleasure read but it's supposed to offer hope to those who have been broken/mistreated; in that regard, the book only does so much.
Gene encourages with the "do nothing" model in that he breaks down how God uses our haters to kill the "Saul" in us. I think that aspect of this book is encouraging for sure.
But the whole "if you do anything....you'll become a Saul" isn't encouraging, and if anything empowers the abusers to continue to abuse.
Sure, in David's situation doing nothing worked against Saul. But, Moses stood up to Pharoh, Nathan...ironically to David, and Elisah and Jehu to King Ahab and Jezebel. So to prescribe a "do nothing" approach to every situation is dangerous. The NT acknowledges this and provides an option to remove sinful Elders in 1 Timothy 5:19-20.
2. The whole "there is no list to measure whether one is anointed and approved by God" also aids in the continuation of abuse. The NT provides various lists that can aid a congregation. The fruit of the Spirit, the qualifications of a Bishop, the qualifications of an Elder, and a list of sinful behaviors.
3. I didn't realize how repetitive the book was the first time around, but it is. Gene Edwards continues to push this "if I do this, I'm a Saul" and "if I do nothing, I'm a David" phrase through multiple characters in the book. I think diving into what made Saul Saul, beyond the spear throwing and David chasing, would have been a more interesting thought experiment.
Pros:
1. the whole "there's a Saul in every one of us" was creative and so true. Every single one of us are sinful beings capable of doing things we can't even imagine. I love how this idea was portrayed in the book.
2. The author does a great job of breaking down Absolum and his application. The section about how rebels always take from the kingdom they left was a very helpful and practical warning. I like how he mentioned the difficulties of leadership as well, and how it's easy to say "I could do better if I was in power".
3. I love the prologue of the book, it was very well done and very creative.
January 31, 2024
This book had such an interesting, fairy tale-like quality of conveying information. I found it to be distracting from the points he was making. Such good information that I recognize I should put into practice!
Read
September 8, 2020Originally I gave this title 3 stars. I am revising my stars to zero.
The reason I am doing so is that since reading this title, several things about my faith journey and expression have changed and I no longer subscribe to evangelical ideologies.
-----------------------
This has been on my "to read" list for awhile so I decided it was time to get around to it. A few years ago it was "the" book in the church I used to attend. That's initially how it landed on my list. Now that I have read it I think maybe the leadership at that church needs to read it again because it seems the lessons they were focused on from the book didn't exactly "take"...but that's a different story for a different time. :)
Regardless.
First of all it is short! I'm getting off easy this month by reading a whole bunch of small books, or booklets as I like to call them. I didn't realize it was not a lengthy read and actually I am glad. The topic that Edwards discusses is one that is best kept short so the reader can process in their own way. Edwards tackles the topic of brokenness in his telling of three kings. Specifically the three kings are Saul, David, and Absalom. I didn't know this picking up the book and was interested at the timing of this read since our home church has been in 1 and 2 Samuel the past few months. I've been studying the lives and stories of these three kings already for quite some time. In storytelling form, with some liberties as to tone/emotion/etc, Edwards relays the differences between the three kings and their approaches to the throne. One king out of three allowed brokenness in his life, the other two did not. Edwards prompts the reader to think through their own approach to brokenness and their own response to it. Sprinkled throughout this fictional telling of a biblical event Edwards gives the readers nuggets to ponder about authority, brokenness, pride, humility, and probably more I didn't pick up on or am not remembering.
It was a good book but didn't knock my socks off. I'm wondering if some of the liberties Edwards took, while I can appreciate them, didn't sit quite right with me. But when all is said and done those are really neither here nor there in the big picture of this topic on brokenness. It's an important topic and one that a believer in God should be practicing in their own life.
The reason I am doing so is that since reading this title, several things about my faith journey and expression have changed and I no longer subscribe to evangelical ideologies.
-----------------------
This has been on my "to read" list for awhile so I decided it was time to get around to it. A few years ago it was "the" book in the church I used to attend. That's initially how it landed on my list. Now that I have read it I think maybe the leadership at that church needs to read it again because it seems the lessons they were focused on from the book didn't exactly "take"...but that's a different story for a different time. :)
Regardless.
First of all it is short! I'm getting off easy this month by reading a whole bunch of small books, or booklets as I like to call them. I didn't realize it was not a lengthy read and actually I am glad. The topic that Edwards discusses is one that is best kept short so the reader can process in their own way. Edwards tackles the topic of brokenness in his telling of three kings. Specifically the three kings are Saul, David, and Absalom. I didn't know this picking up the book and was interested at the timing of this read since our home church has been in 1 and 2 Samuel the past few months. I've been studying the lives and stories of these three kings already for quite some time. In storytelling form, with some liberties as to tone/emotion/etc, Edwards relays the differences between the three kings and their approaches to the throne. One king out of three allowed brokenness in his life, the other two did not. Edwards prompts the reader to think through their own approach to brokenness and their own response to it. Sprinkled throughout this fictional telling of a biblical event Edwards gives the readers nuggets to ponder about authority, brokenness, pride, humility, and probably more I didn't pick up on or am not remembering.
It was a good book but didn't knock my socks off. I'm wondering if some of the liberties Edwards took, while I can appreciate them, didn't sit quite right with me. But when all is said and done those are really neither here nor there in the big picture of this topic on brokenness. It's an important topic and one that a believer in God should be practicing in their own life.
April 23, 2022
This short book of Christian historical fiction follows the life of King David. The first part of the book covers his conflict with King Saul. The second part covers the rebellion of David's son, Absalom. The book focuses on questions like - if someone tosses a spear at you, should you pick it up and throw it back? Also, what is the right response to a rebellion threatening to remove you from the throne?
This is said to be a book for those who have experienced spiritual abuse at the hands of preachers or other church leaders. I see it more as being helpful for anytime you might feel under attack, or when your authority is undermined. Of course, all authority belongs to God, but I think these are situations we've all experienced, maybe multiple times in multiple ways, not necessarily in a church setting. I see these things in my family relationships, for example. This book gives a simple Godly suggestion for how to respond to such challenges.
I'm giving the book only three stars because I really didn't love the writing style. I found it hard to follow at times. The chapters were blessedly short. Apparently author Gene Edwards didn't want us to spend too much time reading a lengthy novel. He just wanted to get his message across in a fictional kind of way, though this was very much based on the Biblical record of the life of King David.
This is said to be a book for those who have experienced spiritual abuse at the hands of preachers or other church leaders. I see it more as being helpful for anytime you might feel under attack, or when your authority is undermined. Of course, all authority belongs to God, but I think these are situations we've all experienced, maybe multiple times in multiple ways, not necessarily in a church setting. I see these things in my family relationships, for example. This book gives a simple Godly suggestion for how to respond to such challenges.
I'm giving the book only three stars because I really didn't love the writing style. I found it hard to follow at times. The chapters were blessedly short. Apparently author Gene Edwards didn't want us to spend too much time reading a lengthy novel. He just wanted to get his message across in a fictional kind of way, though this was very much based on the Biblical record of the life of King David.
Displaying 1 - 30 of 1,114 reviews