Jump to ratings and reviews
Rate this book

Grant's Atlas of Anatomy

Rate this book
Univ. of Toronto, Canada. Superbly illustrated atlas featuring line drawings traced directly from photographs of cadaver sections. Includes new muscle tables, illustrations, diagnostic imaging sections at the end of each chapter, chapter subtitles, and 'pearls.' Previous c1991. For students. Softcover. Human Anatomy Atlases.

700 pages, Paperback

Published August 15, 1999

Loading...
Loading...

About the author

Anne M.R. Agur

58 books2 followers

Ratings & Reviews

What do you think?
Rate this book

Friends & Following

Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!

Community Reviews

5 stars
102 (53%)
4 stars
49 (25%)
3 stars
26 (13%)
2 stars
8 (4%)
1 star
5 (2%)
Displaying 1 - 16 of 16 reviews
Profile Image for Alexia.
19 reviews5 followers
May 21, 2008
Am I the only person who prefers Grant's over Netter? I think so. Netter is dynamic and beautiful, but the number of anatomical structures he labels on one image is baffling. Whereas, Grant's provides a plethora of images, with various angles and tissue layers, in greater detail.
Additionally, the entire cranial nerves chapter is superior to Netter's. Anyone should be willing to admit that.
Profile Image for Galib.
279 reviews70 followers
April 12, 2017
যদিও নিটার'টাই বেশি চলে......তবুও আমার কাছে মনে হয় , এটাই ভালো ।

পরীক্ষায় পাশের জন্য নিটারের বিকল্প হয়তো এখনও নাই ; কেননা, মাসল এটাচমেন্ট কিংবা বোন/ভিসেরা মার্কিং -সব এক পৃষ্ঠায় দেখানো আছে ।

অন্যদিকে,
গ্রান্টসএর সুবিধা হলো .....আপনি যদি ছবিগুলো একএক করে দেখে যান , তবে পুরো সিস্টেটা মাথায় গেঁথে যাবে ; আর, 'চিকিত্সা বিজ্ঞানে ' মাথায় গেঁথে যাওয়াটাই প্রয়োজন ।
Profile Image for Joe.
51 reviews9 followers
March 19, 2010
Grant's Atlas has some of the best conceptual illustrations of the body of any atlas I have read. They are clear and are loaded with details that can truly buttress anatomy classes. However, there is very, very little text, and the text that the authors do include are mere descriptions of the illustrations. When studying anatomy, Grant's is very helpful if you need to look up a structure and clearly see its features and relationships to other features of the body. But when you're trying to learn by visualization - which at least in my experience is probably the best way to learn all of this information - I don't find Grant's to be very helpful. It's also not very expansive on the functional importance of structures and how their dysfunctions can cause serious problems.
Profile Image for Sebastien.
14 reviews2 followers
July 28, 2013
As far as anatomy goes, lots of illustrations from different views, so it's good for that, and, I think, better (though not absolutely required) than general anatomy & physiology books, but I haven't seen Netter's atlas (though I love his drawings), so I'm not sure if it's 5-star worthy.
Profile Image for liza.
175 reviews2 followers
June 17, 2007
very useful for the amateur people mechanic.
Profile Image for Erika Mulvenna.
531 reviews27 followers
November 30, 2007
This was another great trash-pick. WONDERFUL illustrations in this book - I have used it for reference for more than one art project.
Profile Image for Omar.
191 reviews112 followers
July 15, 2013
was my first book in the medical school its simple and has quite informative pictures that we can depend on it
We studied it with clinically oriented anatomy or/and Snell
sometimes cunningham
Profile Image for Oshini Ranasinghe.
1 review
April 25, 2019
Love this book. I'm still a pre med student but this book helped me a lot with anatomy. The illustrations are really in good quality and very clear.
Displaying 1 - 16 of 16 reviews