So there was crystal clear exposition until page 100. I don't know if there was a deadline to meet or if the author just got tired? I've seen this a lot, and I've also done it before. But anyway,
it's interesting because when I was reading through The Philosophy Book by DK, I found this in the Kant section: "Saying that I exist requires a determinate point in time and this in turn requires an actually existing outside world in which time takes place. My level of certainty about the existence of the external world is thus precisely the same as my certainty about the existence of consciousness, which Descartes believed was absolutely certain." This argument does make sense to me, and Kant may have said this somewhere else, but based on the material covered in this book, I got a different sense of his thoughts about the topic. Ostensibly, Kant thinks that you can't really sense your true self because your sense of your true self and your sense of the outside world are both filtered through the internal mental framework of space and time (and other things). So that's why you can be as certain of your self as you can be of the outside world. Correct me if I'm wrong.
All this is very interesting to think about, especially when related to AI, and potentially our brain. It's almost like space and time are our input dimensions. Information is required to actually flow into the input, but our input dimensions are set.
Also, he completely lost me with his moral theory (ha, I think I'm resistant to the idea of self respect). Given, I don't know if I've ever been convinced by any moral theory. It's very pervasive though, especially in kindergartens:
"Would you like it if they threw the scissors at you? No? Then you shouldn't throw it at them."