Threads is a science fiction book with a great story. The title, Threads, has more than one connotation, and Tom Tinney uses it to weave several different plot lines together throughout the the story, and then ties them neatly into a knot at the finale. There are just enough loose ends by the conclusion, that I'm imagining that there might well be a sequel on the way.
The plot is intricate, but the timeline works.
The one thing that I struggled with while reading this book, was the writing. Although Tom Tinney spells correctly and his grammar is generally correct, there are a few problems that should have been picked up by a good editor.
Firstly: Info dumps. Like many Sci-fi stories, there is a lot of information to impart. At the beginning there are a couple of whoppers, and every now and then there's a new one. It's difficult, but integrating them into the story can be done more subtly, which makes the reader less likely to skip sections, which is what I found myself doing at times.
Secondly: Show versus Tell. This is something that every writers has to learn how to do. There is a lot of telling in this book, and not a lot of showing, which is part of the issue with the info dumps. It's a hard line to walk, and one that requires learning how to recognise that you're doing it.
Thirdly: Tense changes. The book is written in past tense, third person, from several points of view, but there are jarring drops into present tense. 'The last thing to check before taking another step is that the left pocket is empty. It was. The system worked.' or 'Then, in 2291, they mysteriously up and moved the entire company and all of its ship building operations away. Apparently they moved very far away. They are well off the travelled grid and some attempts to find them with space telescopes met with serious ire.' This is much more prevalent in the first half of the book, where it almost prevented me finishing the story because it occurred so often.
Fourthly: Wooden dialogue. Contractions are used very rarely when a character is speaking. A typical sentence: "Sorry, Marshall, but you are the last line of defence here," Matt said. "I am not about to take an accidental bullet in the back." 'I am' was almost exclusively used, even in action scenes, which made everyone sound as if they were being excessively polite, or reading from a cue card, even while they were swearing. Again, it did improve towards the end of the book, but it has a fair way to go before it flows.
Tom Tinney has a great imagination, and as I originally stated, I really enjoyed the story. With some tweaks, this could be a truly fabulous book. The characters showed great promise, the plot was nicely done, and the world building was clever. There was enough unpredictability built into the story to keep the plot line ticking over nicely, and I will keep an eye out for the next installation.
A nice gesture is that the some of the proceeds of this book go to support funding for ALS (MND) research and patient care funding. It's a cause close to my heart.