Inspiring account of a universal basic income (UBI) pilot in rural India. This is a very different discussion than UBI for western countries: We're talking about villages with dirt roads that are cut off from the world during monsoons, people who sometimes can't read and write, with no savings, no bank accounts, who need to borrow to buy food or medicine, and whose only access to credit are usurious moneylenders at interest rates of 3 to 10%—per month! Without prompt repayment, which many can't afford because their work and hence wages are highly seasonal, this builds up to 40 to 200% in interest a year. Sic(k). Some are effectively in debt bondage, working for a landlord. This is not at all comparable to a UBI discussion in, say, Norway, where the baseline wealth and standard of living is so much higher and the intended effect is more along the lines of more self actualization and less pressure for industrial or office workers to stay in unhappy jobs. Very, very different discussion.
India does have a number of programmes in place to alleviate poverty, such as subsidized food shops and labour provision schemes; but poor administration, corruption, broken incentives, lack of information, and high efforts needed to obtain them mean that a lot of intended recipients are falling through the cracks. The authors cite an informed estimate that for more than 3 Rupies spent, only 1 reaches an actual recipient.
Long story short: Universal basic income helps significantly in every way, and even more so where there was a local union organization branch (SEWA) present to help. People spend the money in extremely sensible ways: to pay off debt, to save, to invest in productivity—most have a small patch of land for which they buy seeds and fertilizer; also sewing machines to make cloths and raw materials for bracelets, which they then sell on local markets—, to provide for more food and better education for their kids, to get better healthcare, and—often with pooled money—to build up local infrastructure, esp. toilets, wells, irrigation for the fields, and sewage disposal. In particular, they don't waste the money on booze or to slack off, thereby rebutting a common prejudice levelled at them.
The pilot also documents an emancipatory effect in general—such as people being able to negotiate better wages or make better trade-offs between paid labour on someone else's field and work on their own field come harvest time—and for several marginalized groups gaining more agency and independence, in particular scheduled castes (=those at the bottom of the caste hierarchy), women, disabled people and the elderly.
All in all, a very interesting book with many very specific observations about how well-intentioned policies can succeed or fail in harsh reality. On the plus side, this is solid research with clear quantitative findings. On the minus side, the writing is at times rather academic and like bar charts put to words. I wonder if the chapters were originally published papers about the pilot that were compiled with minor edits to form this book. Don't expect a fluffy journalist-written business book read with pop quotes. This is real socio-economic science and, though fairly short, takes effort to get through. It's worth it though!