Though the book was published just a few months after 9/11, it resonates so strongly today. There are the natural early reflections, but the truth claims between Christianity and Islam are very valid, as are the foundational comparisons between American law and principle and those of Islamic states. The book also contains a valuable assessment of the Koran, the history of Islam, and the challenge of correctly assessing or quantifying what a Muslim believes - because of issues of interpretation, succession, doctrine, and branch, as well as individual application.
Best quotes:
"We are all tempted to justify our proclivities with political arguments. On the one hand, those of us who are privileged to live in democracies have convinced ourselves that morality is purely a private matter, and we allow no one to invade that territory. Sit in on the side of any issue and it becomes clear that relativism is the guide writ large on our cultural belief. We hear it said that there is no such thing as an absolute and that each one must decide his or her moral lifestyle. Anyone who holds to absolutes is mocked and derided (p18)... The relativist who argues for the absence of absolutes smuggles absolutes into his arguments all the time, while shouting loudly that all morality is private belief... Alan Dershowitz (says)... 'I do not know what is right'... 'And you know what? Neither do you.' So it is not just that he does not know what is right. It is also that he knows the impossibility of knowing what is right so well that he is absolutely certain that nobody else can know what is right either. There is his absolute. (p19)"
From the American Declaration of Independence: "'We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.' That one sentence sets America apart from most of the nations of the earth. Our value is not derived from government benevolence or from the mercies of democracy. Democracy and individual dignity derive from the transcendent reality of a Creator. Take away the Creator, and we are at the mercy of the powers of the moment." (p27)
"Life is intrinsically sacred because God created it. There is no other way to convey intrinsic sanctity. It cannot be conveyed by human ingenuity or by the passing of a law. This truth is as essential a part of my being as the very life within me--it frames my entire moral outlook... In short, America functions within a moral framework, and that framework can be meaningful only when attached to a Creator... (George Washington's farewell address quoted)... Washington said, 'Let us with caution indulge the supposition that morality can be maintained without religion.' He must have anticipated that an effort would be made to base morality on something other than a religious worldview." (p30-31)
Isaiah 9:6-7: For to us a child is born, to us a son is given, and the government will be on his shoulders. And he will be called Wonderful Counselor, Mighty God, Everlasting Father, Prince of Peace. Of the increase of this government and peace there will be no end. "You see, only the child was born. The Son was not born; the Son was given. He was not born because He eternally exists. His name is Jesus. He is the stone uncut by human hands. He came to offer forgiveness to us all and to teach us what it means to be a part of His family and to honor one another..." (p74-75)
In reference to Yale philosopher Norwood Russell Hanson, who criticizes God's absence with a story about God appearing dramatically like a Zeus-like figure to address him by name and prove His existence, Ravi says: "Just to assure us he was not kidding, Hanson adds, 'Please do not dismiss this example as a playful, irreverent Disney-oid contrivance. The conceptual point here is that if such a remarkable event were to transpire, I for one should certainly be convinced that God does exist.' I can't blame Hanson for representing his case in such melodramatic terms. I too would love for God to make some indisputable appearance; a rending of the skies with sound and light accompaniment. But I am not at all sure that believability is as simple as that. So, I have a question for this professor: Suppose this actually happened, exactly the way you asked for it. Would you be satisfied with that epiphany if, moments later while backing out of your driveway, you accidentally ran over your five-year-old son? What would you want from God then? Would you be content with the vision of God that you had experienced a few minutes before, or would you demand an explanation for this tragedy, as well? Sporadic supernatural demonstrations by God would not satisfy our insistence that He be constantly accountable to us for His actions." (p86)
"A simple law of logic is called the Undistributed Middle. It means that just because two things have one thing in common, doesn't mean they have everything in common. An example of this kind of reasoning is that since elephants have ears and I have ears, I must be an elephant. To undermine the role of religion in society because some religious extremists take advantage of their religious privilege, is no more legitimate than to say that freedom of the press causes the murder of innocent people and should therefore be curtailed: For had not the press telecast the demonstrations that took place at Tiananmen Square against human rights violations in China, the Chinese authorities would never have been able to identify key figures and single them out for retribution." (p102)