James Earl Sherow contends that a vast network of problems in the arid West has sprung from the mistaken notion that water is a commodity to be bought, sold, and traded. This ill-conceived approach to water development, he argues, has resulted in social problems as well as abuse of the environment. In this volume he tells the story of the inhabitants of the "Valley of Content," the High Plains section of the Arkansas River Valley, during the formative period of settlement and development. It was their desire for growth, he maintains, that spurred the construction of the very dams, reservoirs, and water conveyance structures that would ultimately undermine their success. He documents their attempts—both fanciful and fruitful—to bring the river under their control, the waves of new problems that followed each new 'solution,' and the conflict and cooperation the process engendered.
"This is a most important book. Sherow's thesis is compelling. He provides a definitive study for the period, . . . examining water use affecting agriculture, industry, and urban areas in Colorado and agriculture in Kansas. This book will be worthy of a place beside Don Pisani's From the Family Farm to The Irrigation Crusade in California and the West, 1850-1930 and Norris Hundley's Water in California . It adds an important new dimension to the discussion of water in the West, a topic that is no longer one of merely regional concern."— Richard Lowitt , author of The New Deal and the West
Dry academic book detailing an important history - the 1870-1950 political, legal and engineering battles over how the farmers and sugar beet companies, the engineers and irrigation companies, the residents of Pueblo and the sundry politicians of Colorado and Kansas struggled from one unsatisfying compromise to another on how to best disperse the waters of the Arkansas River. Sherow makes clear that the environment was studiously ignored if thought of at all. I imagine it might have been his dissertation and I appreciate the work it required to capture the mind-numbing complexity of the arguments being made and the absolute numbers of people involved over the 70 years covered.