This was a daunting read. It's most likely the most dire real life stories and witnesses that I've read this year. It's literally 100's of cases. Few are "solved". And even the solving is rare to have any tint of joy color to it. When you are not closely associated with a person who has disappeared, vanished/ lost/ or just replaced by a huge void- and more so if it is a family member! Well, I can put myself in many footsteps but I don't think I can approach what that must feel like. And it does not surprise me that the reactions over decades are so entirely various. And that it may often destroy the remaining associations and family connections by a tangent on the way.
It's a 3 star for the form and possibly more than a 4, toward a 4.5 star for the content. The parental kidnapping disappearance cases were 5 star. Every one varies, IMHO. And the outcomes are often one parent never seeing their biological child again. We tend to hear about the others "found" or reconnected. One here established a reconnection after 20 years. The result was that the children (now adults) refused to see or contact in any form their mother. One parent can and might poison the well beyond imaging to any portion of "self-identity".
There is no easy way to tell the width and breadth of this subject matter. Dozens and dozens of scenarios, and 100's if not 1000's of different law agencies and places for their specific requirements for searches. Not only for "missing" but for "ill" or "duplicated" or some other category of negation that is citizen questioned. Or that remains a cipher to foul play or for any of more than 100's of other reasons. Accident, escape, evasion, masquerading, and far more than just the murder or kidnapping that so many may define for/by/in this category. And are all the searches law or association to friendship or blood related? Or are they investigative for private means and long distance searching?
This is an immense and diverse definition for the core of the book. But it was approached in a witness, case, specific statistic and research from 1000 different eyes and directions. And it taught me several facts and more than a handful of realities that I had never considered so deeply as part of this picture.
Too much to describe. But one of them might be the fact that white males' searches are never as long (carried out for lengths of years or decades upon average or as successful to any kind of definitive outcomes as those for young females, children often are). And that traveling, and especially foreign travel, is not as filled with educational/ joyful surmounting the dangerous situations and outcomes. There are far more (multiple, multiple times more) than is either reported or envisioned by any entity (government stats too) within foreign travel experiences, regardless of what country or continent you originate from. And that foreign travel in age groups of the 18-30 is especially problematic to "what happened to them?" Not only for foul play- but within many other criteria for unknown disappearances and proven "deceased" outcomes (but many without a proof of body or returned forensic material to family/home location). Many people that are assumed to have disappeared or have evaded for and by their own onus to establish other identities and "begin" again? Great numbers of these are often put into this very wrong category for "gone" from the get-go. Central America is especially horrendous for the young, middle-aged, old across the boards to "disappear".
And the searchers! Those were inspiring words (and also a whole pallet of different approaches to "searching" now that the internet is so embedded) and also such depth to those who can turn a page and others who just can't (when some knowledge is worse, better, or more complex as it goes to any "now" definitive). There are people who can never recover from losing another human in this sea of "unknown". And others who when they get some or complete "closure"- it negates their spirits completely. The suicide of parental and sibling survivors for those with unknown outcomes are especially drawn with a fine window to their dichotomies here. Sometimes the searching actually keeps their spirits "livable"? So, so sad.
But I thought the read was superlative for that sense alone that the ones who love us the most and who say "she would never have done that" or "he would not use that language in this note" - or any of those particular text or social media "proofs" are so often right. And they KNOW the people who are gone enough to be listened to. And listened to again.
How the laws with timing have changed! That's the other reason that this book becomes an excellent point of law read. And some cultures do not and will not consider this issue as other will either. And never more so than within a "average" or common time lapse to "possible" cognition.