I have mixed feelings about this book. Its purpose is grand: to provide insight into the lives of a handful of women of scripture in an effort to assist and inspire modern women in their own trials. Unfortunately, the execution detracted—sometimes heavily—from this goal.
Frequently throughout the book, conjecture is presented as fact, from small to significant details. For example, in the chapter on Sarah, the author asserts that Sarah gives Hagar to Abraham because she is impatient and is unwilling to wait for the Lord to grant her a child. The intent that the author attributes to Sarah is not mentioned anywhere in scripture, nor is it asserted in any of the reliable commentaries I’ve encountered. The Old Testament Student Manual, published by the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, for example, states, “Sarah’s giving her handmaid, Hagar, to be a wife to Abraham was an expected and logical act” (5-13). And Camille Fronk Olson’s book, Women of the Old Testament, affirms, “After Sarai had endured years of infertility, the catalyst that sparked her decision to inaugurate an alternative plan for a child is not given” (37). The bottom line is that we don’t know exactly what motivated Sarah to give Hagar to Abraham, so it is unwise to attribute to her a lack of faith that she may never have had (and, that is, in my opinion, in opposition to her character as it's presented in scripture). It is even more unwise, in my opinion, to state a guess at Sarah’s motivation as fact, as the author does in this chapter.
There are many other places in this book where mere conjecture is presented as fact. For me, this detracts heavily from the book’s reliability and authenticity. I had the opportunity to have a New Testament class from Professor S Kent Brown while a university student, and I respect and admire him. I don’t know what role he played in this book (he’s listed as a coauthor), but the quality of his typical scholarship is too-often missing. Some of the chapters in this book are excellent, like the chapters on Esther and the Queen of Sheba. They achieve well the goal of this book, and are inspiring. I hear Professor Brown’s voice and see his style in these chapters. I’ve never before read a book by Heather B Moore, but I know she’s written fiction based on some of the women in the scriptures. I can’t help but wonder if perhaps fiction and fact became blurred for her while writing this book. In any case, regardless of who wrote which chapter, the book is presented as a cohesive whole, and I think it misses the target. I also think many of us wish we had more information about the women in the scriptures, but unfortunately, there’s often much that is left to speculation. If we’re going to speculate, we should do so in as educated and inspired a manner as possible, and admit that we’re speculating.