"The scene is London in the fifties. Down from the University, the ambiguous young men, feeling their way through the world of politics, journalism and business, have still not discarded the old but less useful friends of their youth. The problem for the intelligent but less well off is money and, for those with capital, how to keep it and their friends.
"An honourable young member of Parliament is being pressed to join the board of a weekly journal. By fair means or foul...
"(This is the first novel, see my footnote *1 below, in the) 'Alms For Oblivion'...series of novels, all telling separate stories but...linked...by the characters...soldiers, dons, men of business, politicians, writers and plain shits...drawn, in the main, from the upper and upper-middle classes...One aim is to portray both th(eir) weaknesses and strengths...and...to explain their failure to fit into modern Britain along with their curious alacrity to survive and profit...". From the flyleaf of the 1964 hardback edition in the uniform edition.
The first volume (again see my footnote *1 below) of Simon Raven's ten volume 'Alms for Oblivion' series is one of the better novels he wrote and also set out his ambitions for the series. He never said so (at least in print) but many of his early readers and reviewers saw it as a rival to Anthony Powell's 'Dance to the Music of Time' series (for non UK and even younger UK readers I advise googling Powell which I apologise for but if I explain this review will be ridiculously long) or even Anthony Trollope's 'Parliamentary' novels (now usually referred to as his 'Palliser' novels). Alms for Obivion also could be compared to the 'Strangers and Brothers' series of novels by C.P. Snow (now there is a reputation that has collapsed and I am sure will never rise again). But even in its beginnings Alms for Oblivion never rivalled the work of Trollope, Powell or Snow as either 'roman a clef' or 'state of the nation' novels. Indeed Raven after writing the first three volumes largely abandoned the attempt at portraying a broad canvas of UK politics and society and concentrated on portraying things through the eyes of Fielding Gray and his adventures. Well written and amusing though these later volumes are they are no way a portrait of the rich powerful in post WWII UK.
The Rich Pay Late is set in the 1950s an era that Raven knew as it was the period he launched his career as a writer. Unfortunately the 1950s in the UK was vastly different from the same period in the USA. There the template for the future, for good or bad, was being forged in art, literature, film and TV (barely making an impact in the UK for another decade). In the UK it was a time of, largely, stagnant bitterness as the class Raven wrote about coped with creeping destitution and the decay of the UK's importance and power. The Rich Pay Late attempts to portray Britain's betters both as 'better' but also in all their hypocrisy. In this the Alms for Oblivion novels are very much an object of 1960s irreverence and the challenge to authority that came post the Profumo Affair (again I suggest Googling it). But while benefiting from it Raven was never really part of those changes. His increasing lack of connection with or even understanding of how Britain was changing is clear in the later volumes and most particularly 'The First Born of Egypt' series of novels which carries on from Alms for Oblivion but is bizarrely unrelated to any period of UK history and the characters act and speak in a way that exists nowhere outside Raven's imagination.
So what of this novel? As a presentation of UK society the novel has not aged well, Raven's snobbery is on hold (compared to later volumes) but is still unpleasant for a modern reader but Raven was not unique in this and writers like Ian Fleming and even Evelyn Waugh filled their writings of this period with petulant portrayals the young working class who had apparently too much money and to little deference to their betters. It was meant to be mean spirited and unpleasant and reads that way. Raven tries to be sophisticated and cynical but his inability to write a non-public school character who is not completely revolting in looks and character becomes tiresome though, at the same time ,he is also ruthless in his portrayals of his upper class characters. They are also unpleasant, though they knew how to dress, behave and what wine to order, but while they may not smell from lack of washing their unpleasantness is loud and clear. At the time this novel was written the portrayal of the ruling class as full of morally corrupt and debauched characters was very much in vogue and Raven has filled his novels with broad hints of wickedness and sexual depravity.
But Raven's failure to move beyond hints and nudge-nudge, wink-wink pseudo naughtiness means his novels rarely rise above a Carry On, or Confessions of, film level of debauchery. It quickly lost any shock value and his universally unpleasant characters remained distant and unengaging. But, and this is the big problem with Raven, he writes beautifully and engagingly. This novel and the others in the Alms for Oblivion series are compulsively readable and great fun. I have read them singly and in group volumes over many years. They can be addictive but they are not a great portrait of Britain's upper class though they do reflect the way that class has obsessed so many Britons.
I apologise for the length of this review but I have reviewed a great many novels by Raven and I don't want to repeat myself so I will often refer back to this review. Also there is the question of is Raven a 'gay' writer? Although there is a great deal if hinting and insinuation Raven is never explicit. Readers were meant to think he was as likely to sleep with a beautiful boy as a beautiful girl, like his characters, but there is almost never a time when a character actually is seen with a boy. Raven himself was utterly out of sympathy with gay liberation and although there are 'queer' characters and allusions in the novels it is peripherally and heterosexual characters, and sex, predominate. No reader would fear that being seen reading one of Raven's novels would call into question his straightness.
If you can put your hands on this or any of Raven's early novels I would recommend giving them a chance. They are beautifully written, fun and addictive.
*1 The series has subsequently been renumbered so that the volumes are read chronologically according to the date of the events in the novel rather then according to, as here, the date of publication which, I think, is the better way to read them and actually reads better because Raven's ideas about the series and which direction it would take and the characters that would dominate and/or feature changed as he wrote each volume. Even the tenor of the series altered. The characters and apparent direction of the series of the first three volume changed by volume four which was devoted to the school days of Fielding Gray (and others) who, until then, was a relatively minor character in the first three volumes. In subsequent volumes Fielding comes to dominate the series and those characters from the early volumes that survive become peripheral to Fielding's life, career and adventures. Rearranging the series chronologically makes for far less satisfactory reading and it was probably only post Raven's death in 2001 that that a chronological sequence was imposed when the series was republished.