This was a tough one to rate. I could have gone to 3 stars without feeling too queasy, but I'm just not sure. Especially when, at current standing, HTR2 has a higher GR score than the original HTR (which I really enjoyed).
I have a lot of problems with this book. Not least of all is it feels like an attempt to legitimize rap, something I feel like I've written about elsewhere on GR. I hate that bullshit. Trying to legitimize rap with all this bullshit. This is a theme that runs all the way through the book. It was, of course, prevalent in HTR1 as well, but it didn't feel anywhere near as burdensome there. This book really pushes it.
The quotes from the rappers themselves seemed to slip away by the second half of the book. Then it was 90% 'techniques'. Let me tell you something. These 'techniques' are bullshit. I can damn near guarantee you the rappers themselves aren't thinking in these terms. Obviously they use these 'techniques' - there's the lyrics, right there, you can see them. But they do NOT think of things in these terms. It is much more organic.
Reading some of the book towards the end was truly painful. Truly grasping at straws. Flicking through: "Animal noises are sometimes mimicked by MCs. These include chicken noises, such as "pa-cccaawk!" on Cypress Hill's "3 Lil' Putos" (02:36)"... this goes on to list other animal noises MCs have made, along with the song this is featured on & the exact time of the event. It takes up half a page to describe this 'technique'. It is immediately followed by a quote from Del the Funky Homosapien. His quote is not about animal noises as a hip-hop technique. There's sections upon sections about pitch, with lyrical examples, like each thing is this big technique: raising the pitch on the last word, lowering the pitch on the last word, raising the pitch on the first word, lowering the pitch on the first word, raising the pitch for a whole bar, raising the pitch for half a bar... I'm pretty sure I'm not making these memories up.
The proof is in the motherfucking pudding. Almost every sticky note I laid down was on a rapper's quote, because they're talking about their craft in a genuine way. & they almost never talk about things in the author's terms. Some are basic, & I'm not saying there aren't techniques, so they are mentioned - but not with the redundant specificity that the author uses to capture all these ways of rapping. But most of the time, any concept the author tries to put the rapper's rhymes in seems absolutely academic & made up. Sometimes I even got the feeling that a rapper's quote came in answer to a question where the author is trying to get them to talk about things in his way, so they kind of throw him a bone. Because, as we know, the lyrics are right there. Of course the rapper did it. The rapper usually acknowledges this with a generic "Yeah, you have to switch up the styles, so it's not boring."
I don't know. At the start, I really enjoyed the book. I don't really know if there are less quotes in the second half, or if by then I had just had enough bullshit. But the book isn't terrible. It's worth looking at if you liked the first one. But as I said, I feel it falls squarely into an effort to legitimize rap, make it some kind of poetry (the way 'poetry' is viewed & studied by the 'educated' echelons - I don't give a fuck if this sounds ignorant or pretentious, but you know damn well there's a difference between a more academic approach & a more heartfelt approach). Rap is legitimate. Nas is not Shelley. 2Pac is not Byron. Shit, I'm not even Rimbaud. Don't put Michael Jordan on the field with Tiger Woods.
I honestly feel like if you were to take this book too seriously, you would walk away with LESS knowledge about rap.