A volume of studies of utilitarianism considered both as a theory of personal morality and a theory of public choice. All but two of the papers have been commissioned especially for the volume, and between them they represent not only a wide range of arguments for and against utilitarianism but also a first-class selection of the most interesting and influential work in this very active area. There is also a substantial introduction by the two editors. The volume will constitute an important stimulus and point of reference for a wide range of philosophers, economists and social theorists.
Amartya Kumar Sen is an Indian economist who was awarded the 1998 Nobel Prize in Economic Sciences for his contributions to welfare economics and social choice theory, and for his interest in the problems of society’s poorest members.
Sen was best known for his work on the causes of famine, which led to the development of practical solutions for preventing or limiting the effects of real or perceived shortages of food. He is currently the Thomas W. Lamont University Professor and Professor of Economics and Philosophy at Harvard University. He is also a senior fellow at the Harvard Society of Fellows and a Fellow of Trinity College, Cambridge, where he previously served as Master from the years 1998 to 2004. He is the first Asian and the first Indian academic to head an Oxbridge college.
Amartya Sen's books have been translated into more than thirty languages. He is a trustee of Economists for Peace and Security. In 2006, Time magazine listed him under "60 years of Asian Heroes" and in 2010 included him in their "100 most influential persons in the world".
This is a fairly dense collection of academic articles clarifying, critiquing, and replacing utilitarianism. It gives a helpful view of the state of scholarship in philosophical ethics and economics in the 80s when it was published. The essays are of varying quality in style, argument, and personal interest to me. My favorite were: Sen & Williams’ introduction Hare, ‘Ethical theory and utilitarianism’ Harsanyi, ‘Morality and the theory of rational behaviour’ Scanlon, ‘Contractualism and utilitarianism’ Taylor, ‘The diversity of goods’ Hahn, ‘On some difficulties of the utilitarian economist’ Elster, ‘Sour grapes - utilitarianism and the genesis of wants’ Schick, ‘Under which descriptions?’
Tiene un artículo de Elster que argumenta que lo que los individuos consideran como satisfacción no debería ser considerado un criterio de justicia, o de elección social.