Wordsworth described Charlotte Smith as 'with a true feeling for rural nature, at a time when Nature was not much regarded by English Poets.' With William Lisle Bowles, Smith has the distinction of bringing the sonnet back into favour at the outset of the Romantic period.
Charlotte Turner Smith was an English Romantic poet and novelist. She initiated a revival of the English sonnet, helped establish the conventions of Gothic fiction, and wrote political novels of sensibility.
In the last few days I read some of the writer's novels and what impressed me is her very poetic writing. This created the need to look for some of her poems for which she was well known then. So I arrived at this very beautiful collection of poems from a time where poetry was something simpler. A wonderful stream of images and emotions.
Thank you Charlotte Smith for making the sonnet cool again. Love the combination of melancholy/sorrowful themes and the poetic genre most associated with love. Brilliant and beautiful.
I'm honestly not the biggest fan of poetry at all, but this was required reading for one of my uni courses. All I can say really is that I was slightly indifferent throughout it (perhaps due to a general avoidance of poetry on my behalf). I didn't love it to the point of gushing over it, but I have read much worse poems.
so sorrowful and genuienly tender. i felt my heart breaking slightly as we got further through. really delicately and sweetly written though, feels so personal. the sadness was at points so overwhelming though and did feel a bit suffocating at points.
Judged to be an early Romantic poet, Charlotte Turner Smith's sonnets are surprisingly accessible and vary in subject matter from nature to human emotions. I am not quite sure why she has been so neglected as these poems are interesting and original examples of the sonnet form.
My favourite poems weren't all the ones on my special fields list, so I'm glad I looked at the whole thing. It seems to have changed a lot over the course of its seven editions -- I'd like to know more about its publication history. The footnotes were interesting too-- both that she felt the need to identify the sources for her allusions, and the particular sources that she favoured (Shakespeare, Pope, and Gray)