How to see this? No doubt it's interesting that people have noted this golden ratio throughout the ages, and it's interesting to see it parroted in nature. But without understanding why it happens or how it happens, all Elliott can really say is how to measure it.
In fact, apparently, even finding it in the stock market requires some attention, lots of chart and lots of time to decide what ratio to use in order to 'uncover' the hidden features involved. Questions as to what the proper time scale is, or what the correct amounts (inflation adjusted or not) obscure the finding.
Should we understand that this structure is absolute, then we are beholden to find it no matter what. What I wonder is, if the stock market is to be considered mostly random (that is to say too complex to be analysed) should we still be able to trace this sequence out of random numbers, if we fiddle with out metrical tool enough? That we can change the scope of how we see until we find what we are looking for... Without determining an outer bounds for establishing objectivity, this seems like a senseless exercise to simply find a pattern which is both inexplicable and undecipherable. After all, we may know when it goes up, or when it will go down (it's always a matter of time) but for serious investors, there is always the lost opportunity cost of waiting indefinitely for price adjustments which we know to be coming, given all of time.
Elliott was definitely enthusiastic but that didn't translate into something I could hang onto in reading this.