Jump to ratings and reviews
Rate this book

Revelation and the Politics of Apocalyptic Interpretation

Rate this book
John's apocalyptic revelation tends to be read either as an esoteric mystery or a breathless blueprint for the future. Missing, though, is how Revelation is the most visually stunning and politically salient text in the canon. Revelation and the Politics of Apocalyptic Interpretation explores the ways in which Revelation, when read as the last book in the Christian Bible, is in actuality a crafted and contentious word. Senior scholars, including N.T. Wright, Richard Hays, Marianne Meye Thompson, and Stefan Alkier, reveal the intricate intertextual interplay between this apocalyptically charged book, its resonances with the Old Testament, and its political implications. In so doing, the authors show how the church today can read Revelation as both promise and critique.

239 pages, Hardcover

First published January 1, 2012

11 people are currently reading
84 people want to read

About the author

Richard B. Hays

51 books103 followers
Richard Bevan Hays was an American New Testament scholar and George Washington Ivey Professor Emeritus of New Testament Duke Divinity School in Durham, North Carolina. He was an ordained minister in the United Methodist Church.

Ratings & Reviews

What do you think?
Rate this book

Friends & Following

Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!

Community Reviews

5 stars
5 (23%)
4 stars
15 (71%)
3 stars
1 (4%)
2 stars
0 (0%)
1 star
0 (0%)
Displaying 1 - 2 of 2 reviews
Profile Image for Neil White.
Author 1 book7 followers
April 12, 2018
Some good articles by a number of scholars I respect about Revelation.
Profile Image for Joel.
58 reviews10 followers
August 16, 2019
A good collection of essays.
There are points where I wondered why a certain paper was included as the connections between topics wasn’t as explicit as each author may have hoped. There was also a bit of repetition between the views of each scholar that begs to wonder why there weren’t some more diverse views represented.
.
That being said the stand-out papers for me were those delivered by Hieke, Hays, Wright, and Meye Thompson. It was an enjoyable read, although each paper begs to be a book of its own. It’s essentially the beginnings of 9 different conversations.
Displaying 1 - 2 of 2 reviews

Can't find what you're looking for?

Get help and learn more about the design.