Most Americans would probably be surprised to hear that, in 1959, James Burnham, a leading political thinker questioned whether Congress would survive, and whether the Executive Branch of the American government would become a dictatorship. In the last decade, members of Congress have impeached a president, rejected or refused to consider presidential nominees, and appear in the media criticizing the chief executive. Congress does not exactly appear to be at risk of expiring. Regardless of how we perceive Congress today, more than forty years after Congress and the American Tradition was written, Burnham's questions, arguments, and political analysis still have much to tell us about freedom and political order.
Burnham originally intended Congress and the American Tradition as a response to liberal critics of Senator McCarthy's investigations of communist influence in the United States. He developed it into a detailed analysis of the history and functioning of Congress, its changing relationship with the Executive Branch, and the danger of despotism, even in a democratic society.
The book is organized into three distinct parts. "The American System of Government," analyzes the concept of government, ideology and tradition, power, and the place and function of Congress within the American government. "The Present Position of Congress," explores its law-making power, Congressional commissions, treaties, investigatory power, and proposals for Congressional reform. "The Future of Congress," discusses democracy and liberty, and ultimately asks, "Can Congress Survive?" Michael Henry's new introduction sheds much insight into Burnham's writings and worldview, combining biography and penetrating scholarly analysis. He makes it clear why this work is of continuing importance to political theoreticians, historians, philosophers, and those interested in American government.
James Burnham (1905-1987) began his career as a professor of philosophy at New York University. He co-founded, with William F. Buckley, Jr., The National Review . His books include The Managerial Revolution, The Defenders of Freedom , and Suicide of the West .
Michael Henry received his advanced degree in political theory. He has been teaching philosophy at St. John's University in New York since 1977.
James Burnham was an American popular political theorist, best known for his influential work The Managerial Revolution, published in 1941. Burnham was a radical activist in the 1930s and an important factional leader of the American Trotskyist movement. In later years, as his thinking developed, he left Marxism and produced his seminal work The Managerial Revolution. He later turned to conservatism and served as a public intellectual of the conservative movement. He also wrote regularly for the conservative publication National Review on a variety of topics.
I read this book while still in high school in 1962. It left a deep impact on me to this day. It outlines in the history of Supreme Court decisions the steady transfer of congressional power to the executive branch of government long ago frustrating the checks and balances designed into the Constitution by the Founders. Today the balance of power is so lopsided in favor of the executive branch that the separation of powers is no longer able to maintain that balance and we are nearing the end of representative self-government because of it. When that happens, the Republic is dead and we will be no better or more free than any of the other nations of the world. The American dream is coming to an end. It makes me really sad.
Burnham makes a great historical argument that the legislature and not the executive is the key to liberty and constitutional government. At the time this book was written congress was being weakened by an increasingly powerful executive. The last few decades congress seems to be getting some of its power back, but definitely not the norm that was seen before the 1930s. All in all a great read that helped me to think more about the roles of the various branhes of government, especially in light of the cult of the American presidency supported by both major political parties.
"A very good critique of executive power, defense of legislative government, and explanation of the difference between mass-based politics and an ordered constitutional system." - Daniel McCarthy